IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] AD review of draft-ietf-abfab-use-cases

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Mon, 23 July 2012 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908221F8697 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TuovMuyv5AyF for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2385121F8679 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (2.65.70.36.mobile.tre.se [2.65.70.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q6N7bZUd015129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:37:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5009BBEC.3070100@sunet.se>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:13:32 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <500993C0.7040806@cs.tcd.ie> <5009A181.8060406@sunet.se> <5009B209.3050904@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <5009B209.3050904@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: abfab@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [abfab] AD review of draft-ietf-abfab-use-cases
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/abfab>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:37:57 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/20/2012 09:31 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/20/2012 07:20 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> 
>>> 9. 3.9 seems quite far-fetched to me. Do you really expect
>>> sensors to use gss-eap?
>> 
>> I've seen a couple of examples of sensor nets built using wifi 
>> hardware - sensors don't have to be small "toaster-like"
>> objects.
> 
> Sure. I've built a number networks with nodes like that myself,
> (e.g. [1] :-) Never needed nor considered anything like abfab. Ours
> are v. small networks of course, but I've also never heard anyone
> ask for what 3.9 is selling.
> 
> But like I said, its a comment that the wg can take or leave,
> before or during IETF LC.
> 
> S.
> 
> [1]
> http://extremecom2012.ee.ethz.ch/papers/6-extremecom2012-Arkko.pdf

Good - I misunderstood your comment as saying something else! All good.

	Cheers Leif

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAJu+cACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndDgwCfcX7kXlFeucnWXH25Hx8ymXiH
Gx0AnjXSiazWFgRDaLMRN/7kvfxGwsHv
=75eH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email