IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] AD review of draft-ietf-abfab-use-cases

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Fri, 20 July 2012 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449F411E80CF for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jKs74XpoFU6 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net (backup-server.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:1::66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2195511E80BD for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.132] ([89.184.152.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q6KIKoaH011413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:20:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5009A181.8060406@sunet.se>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:20:49 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: abfab@ietf.org
References: <500993C0.7040806@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <500993C0.7040806@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [abfab] AD review of draft-ietf-abfab-use-cases
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/abfab>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:20:01 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> 9. 3.9 seems quite far-fetched to me. Do you really expect sensors
> to use gss-eap?

I've seen a couple of examples of sensor nets built using wifi
hardware - sensors don't have to be small "toaster-like" objects.

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAJoXwACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfnawCbBdzebEAYEMS7GA+pP5OhW3RJ
v0kAn14hYppBapBTHtvlAP1zW5cJ7uSx
=SzsR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email