IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Agenda

" Kepeng Li " <1095318589@qq.com> Mon, 14 July 2014 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <1095318589@qq.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133C61A05C0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oydm-XcGBMgY for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgau1.qq.com (smtpbgau1.qq.com [54.206.16.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BF7F11A0537 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201307; t=1405348887; bh=v1+oBuVDS/xG9Nx6mKBSXh1evd4lnzhVksoBpylpaNc=; h=X-QQ-FEAT:X-QQ-SSF:X-HAS-ATTACH:X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: X-Originating-IP:X-QQ-STYLE:X-QQ-mid:From:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date: X-Priority:Message-ID:X-QQ-MIME:X-Mailer:X-QQ-Mailer: X-QQ-ReplyHash:X-QQ-SENDSIZE; b=w7HfdTAO44ohIiu715uU2PqZLMw7DJSA/CT5hOjP5/1iuXVOMHBNY/b09aY6XOOD6 hLIjwLaAaMAVRvlSwmvFzLgqJwE9I++CyV41J/gKjF3gteoHjwczP+WYiLxiMbaEad Xf/QkSxWq5OPEvg1CfJiA2dq6fcMh6nI54hnDf8c=
X-QQ-FEAT: xXPDKpQBGZzspf2z8ysqPgpP83aUpU3M1dJUzwYKdj0SX7ZV70FPvONs5yBsF 46sfGqJXRXnqAr2dd9K9pcmoMGtHxzjhTHCyvEOMiRNdSsTVFr/t1xRSeGIpPqdaxpNK5d9 qJWDfXwoMo0wtFO+GEDjmVSwPBLyO8IX2hpdmzOxGb/vdJNYUQ==
X-QQ-SSF: 0000000A000000F000000000000000M
X-HAS-ATTACH: no
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-Originating-IP: 219.134.221.163
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webmail431t1405348886t5982120
From: Kepeng Li <1095318589@qq.com>
To: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_53C3EC16_09180DB8_1D4BD5A1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:41:26 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_32B42D166ACEF73A17DCFD5A@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-ReplyHash: 670115630
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/6yZ1bhTpOBXlM4uIIf3-FxK5fK0
Subject: Re: [Ace] Agenda
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:41:34 -0000

> What do you mean with "What transport should be used?" Is that the DTLS vs Object Security discussion?‍


This is related to this discussion:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/current/msg00695.html‍


Kind Regards
Kepeng


------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Ludwig Seitz";<ludwig@sics.se>;
Date:  Mon, Jul 14, 2014 08:41 PM
To:  "ace"<ace@ietf.org>; 

Subject:  Re: [Ace] Agenda



_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email