IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Agenda

Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se> Tue, 15 July 2014 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ludwig@sics.se>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FCC1A0ACC for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKO007qBp2JX for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbox.sics.se (outbox.sics.se [193.10.64.137]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12A31A033D for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [192.36.171.201]) by outbox.sics.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55296EA; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from letter.sics.se (letter.sics.se [193.10.64.6]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id s6F8P6W0018481; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:25:06 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.108] (unknown [85.235.11.178]) (Authenticated sender: ludwig@sics.se) by letter.sics.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58EF940116; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53C4E562.4040202@sics.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:25:06 +0200
From: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Likepeng <likepeng@huawei.com>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
References: <53C398ED.3030302@gmx.net> <53C3D013.6030006@sics.se> <34966E97BE8AD64EAE9D3D6E4DEE36F258177D9A@SZXEMA501-MBS.china.huawei.com> <53C4E3D1.7020804@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <53C4E3D1.7020804@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060009060703010101050101"
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-sics-se:default, sics-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-p0f-Info: os=Solaris 10, link=Ethernet or modem
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=85.235.11.178; country=SE; region=Skåne; city=Lund; latitude=55.7000; longitude=13.1833; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=55.7000,13.1833&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sics-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sics-se:default, sics-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09Mqwp6g4 - 986d6450328a - 20140715
X-Antispam-Training-Forget: https://canit.sunet.se/canit/b.php?i=09Mqwp6g4&m=986d6450328a&t=20140715&c=f
X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: https://canit.sunet.se/canit/b.php?i=09Mqwp6g4&m=986d6450328a&t=20140715&c=n
X-Antispam-Training-Spam: https://canit.sunet.se/canit/b.php?i=09Mqwp6g4&m=986d6450328a&t=20140715&c=s
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.36.171.201
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/ixuDO-jY8pnnudByFJtoj6rWqsk
Subject: Re: [Ace] Agenda
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:25:11 -0000

On 07/15/2014 10:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>
> On 07/15/2014 02:39 AM, Likepeng wrote:
>>> I think this question (3c) is too generic. If we ask like that, we will just reiterate
>>>> the discussions currently ongoing on the DICE list (see the "Tyranny of the
>>>> Lightswitch" thread).
>> We can go a little bit further:
>> - long-term key established between the client and the authorization server
>> - long-term key established between the authorization server and the resource server
>> - short term key established between the client and the resource server
>
> The discussion on the DICE list was useful and of course the issues
> surface also in this group.
>
> If we could only figure out how to make any progress on that topic this
> would be useful. Any ideas?
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>

Well in the DICE thread you said that you could ask a colleague about 
the price of adding asymmetric crypto hardware:

> I could ask one of
> my co-workers to share his insight on cost of hardware and embedded
> industry with the rest of the group. This would be one data point. Maybe
> there are other companies willing to share their experience.

I think that would be progress.


/Ludwig

-- 
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
SICS Swedish ICT AB
Ideon Science Park
Building Beta 2
Scheelevägen 17
SE-223 70 Lund

Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
http://www.sics.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email