[Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 24 January 2024 09:04 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ace@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170608706039.31385.2580933277845808671@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 01:04:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/9LIfXDMVnqB7wCLB1qv0Q9DtY3o>
Subject: [Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-01-24
IETF LC End Date: 2024-01-25
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
The document defines a well known uri. Through out the document it keeps the
name well-known but it should be replaced with the specified coap-eap by the
authors or as a directive to the rfc editor. As for the iana registration
request rfc8615 registration procedure is specification required and not expert
review. There is also a missing column “state” probably should be permanent.

[Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-w… Roni Even via Datatracker
Re: [Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-a… Dan Garcia Carrillo