Re: [Ace] [IANA #1284521] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm (core-parameters, if=)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 21 February 2024 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E18C151081 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:26:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NO2Zu6zGl_J5 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43181C14CF1B for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eduroam-0148.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0148.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.16.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Tg4VK75FLzDCcF; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:26:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-585278-1708479018-205.1284521-9-0@icann.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:26:33 +0100
Cc: jaime@iki.fi, jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com, Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>, ace@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 730232793.3173161-5a9efe28a4901c70c0b5b475160d45cd
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06DC91CB-2189-4FFE-8582-525FF1C567E3@tzi.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1284521@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-793730-1697753456-789.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-793730-1697755422-1727.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1565511-1698336237-52.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <82D54378-6F51-428B-AF39-9346C0F5A4BE@tzi.org> <rt-5.0.3-582748-1701218486-653.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-110682-1705695506-1652.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-351706-1706293483-499.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-98030-1706911351-946.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1249316-1707756322-214.1284521-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-585278-1708479018-205.1284521-9-0@icann.org>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/B6u6fzjvk0gXBDpMz-6_afp_-Nk>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [IANA #1284521] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm (core-parameters, if=)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:26:40 -0000

Hi David,

On 2024-02-21, at 02:30, David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten, Jaime, and Christian (cc: ace WG),
> 
> Following up on this; as the designated experts for the Interface Description (if=) Link Target Attribute Values registry, can you review the updated proposed registrations in draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-18 for us? You had previously reviewed draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-17. This document has already been approved for publication by the IESG.
> 
> The authors have added a new "ace.groups" proposed registration in addition to the previously reviewed "ace.group".

This is the appropriate reaction to my comment on -17.
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/qG-E2rRiHyqyQXPXDnuPN7b8c8I>

-17 was using a single if= type for two related, but different kinds of resources.
This can be made to work, but is not the best solution.
Splitting this into two makes it easier to find the resource(s) that you actually want.

> Please see:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm/
> 
> Could you please review at your earliest convenience?

This change is approved.

> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registrations at:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters/
> 
> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act on the first response we receive.
> 
> With thanks,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist