IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 14 March 2018 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04151126B6D; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eAZiqXcJNTHA; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00B6124BFA; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AA420091; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:53:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6F88106B; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
cc: draft-ietf-ace-coap-est@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <001d01d3b8b4$f6e71600$e4b54200$@augustcellars.com>
References: <001d01d3b8b4$f6e71600$e4b54200$@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7-RC3; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:44:37 -0400
Message-ID: <25368.1520991877@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/B823L-OjSNJhB_ggoIKy4zj63zQ>
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 01:44:39 -0000

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
    > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension is
    > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 1.3
    > section for clarity.

I don't understand what you are referring to.

What is the "port format extension" you are referring to, and where in
section 2 do you think we are depending upon it?

I'm thinking that you are jumping to a conclusion based upon some poorly
written text on our part :-)

But, since I think all the authors are ignorant of that extension, we must be
misleading you unintentionally.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email