IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] ACE Use Case document

"Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C271A0AD9 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4cGK6qwa_WH for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lrp0019.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9FC61A0AD1 for <Ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DBXPR04CA009.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.191.157) by AM3PR04MB0632.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.133.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1015.19; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:44 +0000
Received: from DB3FFO11FD007.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::170) by DBXPR04CA009.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:9800::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1015.19 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:43 +0000
Received: from mail.philips.com (206.191.240.52) by DB3FFO11FD007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.216.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1010.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:43 +0000
Received: from DBXPRD9003MB059.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com ([169.254.7.226]) by DBXPRD9003HT003.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com ([141.251.25.208]) with mapi id 14.16.0466.000; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:40 +0000
From: "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
To: Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghyouk@gmail.com>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ace] ACE Use Case document
Thread-Index: AQHPvUSp1/liP+U3d0aCbPEfpgzmOJviPJ6AgABC8ACAAAZkAA==
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:39 +0000
Message-ID: <BE6D13F6A4554947952B39008B0DC0153E830C51@DBXPRD9003MB059.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
References: <53F5F6F0.4000202@gmx.net> <d230f9127d5342ee80dc6d890aace88a@BLUPR03MB309.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <D86F6615-FAEE-4E53-AFED-DA2D81617F45@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D86F6615-FAEE-4E53-AFED-DA2D81617F45@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [194.171.252.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:206.191.240.52; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(428002)(85714005)(51704005)(13464003)(377454003)(53754006)(199003)(24454002)(189002)(76482001)(80022001)(90102001)(4396001)(92566001)(2421001)(104016003)(77982001)(55846006)(87936001)(97736001)(85306004)(81342001)(97756001)(101416001)(21056001)(20776003)(46406003)(47776003)(64706001)(79102001)(83072002)(66066001)(33656002)(1511001)(85852003)(92726001)(86362001)(84676001)(95666004)(105586002)(99396002)(44976005)(107046002)(6806004)(50466002)(19580395003)(77096002)(83322001)(74502001)(19580405001)(76176999)(81542001)(106116001)(81156004)(325944007)(69596002)(46102001)(106466001)(50986999)(31966008)(15975445006)(54356999)(2656002)(74662001)(68736004)(23726002)(7059011)(567094001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR04MB0632; H:mail.philips.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:ErrorRetry; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 03152A99FF
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: philips.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 206.191.240.52) smtp.mailfrom=sandeep.kumar@philips.com;
X-OriginatorOrg: philips.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/F--J4TK4GegTYwjMMyDeVVOFsRk
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "Ace@ietf.org" <Ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] ACE Use Case document
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:37:49 -0000

The call for adoption is only to make this a WG document so that folks can contribute to a single document. The document can only get broader with consensus if it is a WG document. Do you think there are issues in the current use cases that should be removed?

Sandeep

-----Original Message-----
From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jong-Hyouk Lee
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:12 AM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; Ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] ACE Use Case document

Hi all

As like Anthony, I think that the use-cases document should be broader than the current one. The working group should try to get some more inputs from folks before trying to fire the call for adoption.

J.
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University

#email: jonghyouk@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon

On Aug 26, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> wrote:

> My major issues and comments with the document is that it does not cover a lot of the use case that we see in the marketplace, the use case document can be broader than the scope of the WG (even though I don't see much in the charter that limits the scope).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 6:41 AM
> To: Ace@ietf.org
> Subject: [Ace] ACE Use Case document
>
> Hi all,
>
> we started a call for adoption of draft-seitz-ace-usecases as a starting point for the use case charter item in July and we were hoping to get a lot of feedback.
>
> Unfortunately, it turned out that only very few responded, namely Robert, Michael, Peter, and Rene (whereby Rene voiced concerns).
>
> Of course, you may have been on vacation and therefore unable to review the draft and to respond.
>
> With the vacation period coming to an end we hope to receive additional feedback from other working group participants.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Kepeng
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ace mailing list
> Ace@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

________________________________
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email