[Ace] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

[Lars Eggert via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Meral Shirazipour for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ihMGS0Wl8sdlJlzkSZU-hlm7wRE).

## Comments

### Boilerplate

This document uses the RFC2119 keywords "SHOULD", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"OPTIONAL", "SHOULD NOT", "SHALL", "MAY", "RECOMMENDED", "SHALL NOT", "MUST
NOT", "MUST", and "REQUIRED", but does not contain the recommended RFC8174
boilerplate. (It contains some text with a similar beginning.)

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Section 4, paragraph 0
```
  4.  Security Considerations
```
Why is this a list of bullets instead of just regular text?

### Uncited references

Uncited references: `[RFC5280]`.

### Outdated references

Document references `draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-13`, but `-21` is
the latest available revision.

### Grammar/style

#### Section 2.3, paragraph 1
```
ional and potentially large fields. Thus a CMP message can be much larger tha
                                    ^^^^
```
A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb "Thus".

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool