[Ace] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06: (with COMMENT)

[John Scudder via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nits:

- Please expand RS on first use. (It’s first expanded in Section 4 but first
used in Section 1.)

- “As resource-constrained devices are not expected to support both transport
layer security mechanisms. Clients and Resource Servers SHOULD support DTLS and
MAY support TLS.” Is this supposed to be one sentence, with a comma between
clauses? If not, then I don’t understand the first sentence (fragment). For
that matter even if you make the period into a comma, I don’t immediately see
how the second clause follows causally from the first, but I’m not too bothered
about this.