IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B3912D868; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:27:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6oUOfB6k4xJ; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36410126E01; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w286RvNO007915 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 00:27:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org>, "ace-chairs@ietf.org" <ace-chairs@ietf.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
References: <152046753224.21454.8592401400498503627.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180308042415.GA27850@mit.edu> <SN6PR2101MB094361203E6C9741F2511A7EF5DF0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <81651717-66f6-d373-3264-a8af228ec85b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:27:51 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR2101MB094361203E6C9741F2511A7EF5DF0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/Nov70ksAaRsFqbhAhy5zP7ZLTyY>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:27:59 -0000

On 3/7/18 11:47 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> The point of including new CWT definitions for "StringOrURI" and "NumericDate" was so that we could use them directly.  Prefixing them with "CWT" isn't necessary for the meaning to be clear in context.


Given that the current formulation confused both Benjamin and me, I 
think this assertion doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email