IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ace] Offline operation of Resource Server

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 14 July 2014 11:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE181A038C for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 04:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqUf35U33lbD for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 04:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C93D1A038B for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 04:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.254.119] ([80.92.116.212]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbOoG-1Wq5dJ06sO-00IpF3 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:35:57 +0200
Message-ID: <53C3C09A.5090707@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:35:54 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vfxMpjiWEtW4tDN4pDgX4Lf8tjjvXxFLd"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1wD9z4E4Zo2VtfNHgaeEy7hRVETD4Jk2hP5X0ILIfU0IlKqMycH c15aRfWsLDjCP/74sEOGrW//9s4vz5apN0k9aVxEJf2Ecme1jyGmLR6LjHyuXwdIPWe0n+D FJ/mez5uEumi9KUoJJb/x4aRM4YPy1oMLi2rDEawmNPwEqBLrc+yG2Ds25RuPCDKag2yabT VoRxyS0+J7ndMmQR6Z8MQ==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/nhHV_3FOUJ85nRz0-I0BFxIiYWA
Subject: [Ace] Offline operation of Resource Server
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:36:00 -0000

Hi all,

in one of my previous mail I said that the requirements rule out an
EAP/AAA solution and this impression was based on reading the following
requirement from http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seitz-ace-usecases-01

"
   o  U5.2 The meters must be able to perform fine-grained access
      control on the metering data and on the configuration while being
      offline.
"

I was wondering how strong the requirement for not having a real-time
interaction between the resource server and the AS is.

Ciao
Hannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email