Re: [Acme] draft minutes from june 2 interim

[Roland Shoemaker <[e-mail]>]

Sorry I wasn't able to make it for this call, comments inline:

On 06/02/2017 12:36 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> There were about 20 people present on the call.  It lasted about 50 minutes.  Would those who were on the call please post corrections here?  Thank you.
> 
> 
>>                Hugo's CAA draft (already adopted, short, might be ready for WGLC) -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-caa-01
> 
> Chairs will call for consensus on moving to WGLC.
> 
>>                Yaron Sheffer et al draft on STAR -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-acme-star-lurk-00
> 
> There was discussion on how this overlaps with the tls-subcert document. After some discussion, there was good consensus to ask that this be split into two parts (the ACME-related revalidation and the CDN-related deployment) and the chairs will ask for consensus on adoption.  The split will happen before or after adoption.
> 
>>                Mary Barnes on an ACME challenge for ATIS/SIP -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-00
> 
> There was some discussion, but strong consensus to adopt this by the WG.  Chairs will confirm on the list.
> 
>>               And also Jon Peterson et al https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-acme-telephone-00
> 
> Also similar discussion.  General agreement to also adopt this, and keep in close contact with STIR to make sure things progress properly.
>  
>>                Roland Shoemaker on an ACME challenge for validating IP addresses -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shoemaker-acme-ip-00
> 
> Briefly discussed; Yaron requested clarification on the use-case before considering adoption.

I think there are two main use-cases for this: people who want
certificates for public IPv4/6 addresses which is not incredibly common
but is a feature offered by a number of existing commercial CAs, and is
therefore something ACME should attempt to provide parity with; and
people who want to use ACME in an internal non-public CA for generating
certificates for various services which use them for, i.e., RPC endpoint
authentication.

> 
>> In addition, Alexey is interested in helping with an ACME challenge for email certificates. Is anyone else interested in helping to draft drafting?
> 
> Alex posted a draft just before the meeting.  Consensus was to split the SMTP-server related part and the user S/MIME related part and work on them separately.
> 
> At the end of the meeting, Kathleen pointed out that Ted has a new role as IAB Chair, and wants to step down from ACME co-chair. The plan would be to have a new co-chair for Prague, and then after the Prague meeting, for Ted to abandonXXXXXX relinquish the co-chair role.  If you are interested in volunteering, please let Kathleen (and perhaps ekr and the current chairs) know.
> 
> Related to this, the ACME base document is almost done. The Chairs strongly encouraged Richard et al to finish by mid-June so that we could enter WGLC and address any issues that might come up (if any do) at the Prague meeting.
> 
> Please send/post any corrections by mid-next-week so that we can start the calls for adoption right away.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> 

-- 
Roland Bracewell Shoemaker
Software Engineer
Linux Foundation / Internet Security Research Group