IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6103)

Aaron Gable <aaron@letsencrypt.org> Wed, 03 January 2024 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron@letsencrypt.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFF2C14F6A0 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:11:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=letsencrypt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iH_3yY3FJs0h for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:10:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B88C008A6F for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bbbe583e04so3416088b6e.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:09:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letsencrypt.org; s=google; t=1704301769; x=1704906569; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ojums/o+IlQClPp0390poksKrPK4HVUddOaDkT8cf90=; b=dRezyjvht5qZZwS14PqN62LVbK9+iHPRw9mN3eSws/F/mrtAEuNnr2LCOT48fKBr6x O/YhafVZBI7cfXN4nn57pijCoynaTOMSz63FLh3hXPBZJzafTBqgxehP8JnKxF2c7vmd b8qicvt0JYvNtDyb3yyGHNEInsEJhb1nPPZXY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704301769; x=1704906569; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ojums/o+IlQClPp0390poksKrPK4HVUddOaDkT8cf90=; b=hfyPTbc3DuqTxKk/RQ7zhXfJYq2TR4z7z/iZxrE5/zeDae4KYTMbGmY6wAeZe87jcY rJeLEYrJBcwW74REHH06D5HM07h/PLqDHmuMZ0AGuZd+l0FeYyqYpdr27Dteu8mssKJi 432VcV4+FKOyXY2xUWgjzRi6M4UjxxS2IYyHO2BKjnPh8zQJPBOSDHRoyv0hBqwgi4kz FMOTYP0r0SBSEPcL9lS0EdHuziymrY5VaANjqFLVTQ0eiwfaArn+qmc6Tlvh9WoTU5Vy PWIoscoUOZjxr5CefLp6+fvAXuiQ62WcOxt62jR4NkD39FXWrQiwOe+EkxshEpu3fTX2 7/BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwULZ23c1y/uS8/lRjMdaBEaUuD3c8LCA1V55BE4DGfQORyliGy b6mSGZqL/uZ1DcXGDKRH8ULPIjLAMNe0IkYiCkBdlrQFIc1DCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtOl8Khd0+QkQnnd10kYBZ0xpyXacalcWi6XnKCXza3p5b0NlT4MSltowbgynRRmOSvFfAN+xZX7ZyJ99QwRY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:2b02:b0:204:32f7:6668 with SMTP id dr2-20020a0568712b0200b0020432f76668mr9106791oac.34.1704301768810; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:09:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200414104914.936FEF4071E@rfc-editor.org> <CAGgd1OcF7V0XWen2rAySZcxpK97HU3Q9mPmYKgJaVMRaXOGs3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1OcF7V0XWen2rAySZcxpK97HU3Q9mPmYKgJaVMRaXOGs3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Gable <aaron@letsencrypt.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:09:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEmnErdJsfL_5cRL-t2KUOZNGQvwHzKnQv4VpkzKhOGxauxN-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Cc: rlb@ipv.sx, nolte@dfn-cert.de, jdkasten@umich.edu, cpu@letsencrypt.org, jsha@eff.org, rdd@cert.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, acme@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000853766060e0dad93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/1b8MCzhqkpu1axmwF7SGDisBECc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 03:03:09 -0800
Subject: Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6103)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 17:11:02 -0000

Agreed. Especially because the "newAuthz" resource is optional, this
omission seems minor. I would accept as an editorial erratum.

Aaron

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 4:03 AM Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> wrote:

> This errata also had no responses.  In this case, I'd suggest rejecting
> it, or making it editorial.  I don't think it affects how anyone would
> implement or interpret the RFC.  But again, I'd like confirmation (or
> correction).
>
> Deb
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:19 AM RFC Errata System <
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
>> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6103
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Theodor Nolte <nolte@dfn-cert.de>
>>
>> Section: 7.1.
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>    o  A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3)
>>
>>    o  A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4)
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>    o  A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3)
>>
>>    o  A "newAuthz" resource (Section 7.4)
>>
>>    o  A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4)
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The item for the "newAuthz" resource is missing in the list of resources.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
>> Publication Date    : March 2019
>> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J.
>> Kasten
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email