IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6103)

Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> Wed, 03 January 2024 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <debcooley1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA6CC2FEE05 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 04:03:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nO69aDKn3Bmg for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 04:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29BD3C2FEE04 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 04:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-35feb61c91fso36374585ab.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 04:03:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704283411; x=1704888211; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=J/jJPC+7Q9bAsSAxYNBZUbHDxB41lH2/+iVnEQ+4fPI=; b=m8MT0RFQxfMwIWfRiyjGLw5a76WUVZ3uy7KzaoWGXdNSFz2IHoxceVS9bDv8HE+0p9 35A8WihRaJIxzJzcyL1pZTMlWBHjcnMkR2V5M8t2RUHkSheQVaye8pzU4XvJAsVWudL1 fnmHveXEP6uhzx7JV/WetGCi1BoZYF3uYxvaOYxlwdlGWnwzJxFXpTbtcNC/H6B9rwS7 Tlxo4PsyvXRwIdTktNA5AzDl0fp9vsXJeajjOQLzrK0a/TU/rutOOFcthOzccYDVV5Tj hOcquO1K/eEE+ml/rDaKOyijKXuLDd4Zm561+/Lg28UddbwpNfnOyz3BHdwVb9KBsR92 02MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704283411; x=1704888211; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=J/jJPC+7Q9bAsSAxYNBZUbHDxB41lH2/+iVnEQ+4fPI=; b=Z0KS4edePOHoeI7ZHZmDnQgq84mVnYaOZ5RFZda5YI2LS9q6ZdqrkiVIAz2SwhW+Vm hkKYc9HDmsomP8gmnIHyzTS5PspU8mmH+1kY1Cj7NZuN0seRB6Gcmyw/sKIeB4juxl5S a4YtR7wa6gLnllUif8Iesdtsrd2hfM9rSQ0EQQLYxaNHSOn+lGC7X+86/MGBjdUMg8fv Nov+uUt6CdzXQ54Na9igfxMHUkZSYSTHrex895GJYxZXIhPsz31S1TqVdl4jboVh2J+M UCBe7vU2ri6vENy7yqmwsg0u+FrrIuRYT3jJDGUuVeAipIzyzwJhVNyTdaEkVMCzwCfJ 6PMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxGLKgfCiURfP5qcA/RC022jLSHalKfzX9KMZBgzz0Zd6LJER/I Pz3UNNjYMPEpGjgXcPhjpuxi/FKx3STkbHTZ6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/NhhOGw6R1v7pnrAM/NcP0MU/wcrAiU9ut7vbdbUmzsldR0MdU5cMoTFG7HV/sjUMsUvAvBnmIQa2juFyQcE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:188a:b0:35f:eb44:c77f with SMTP id o10-20020a056e02188a00b0035feb44c77fmr16678410ilu.94.1704283411166; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 04:03:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200414104914.936FEF4071E@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200414104914.936FEF4071E@rfc-editor.org>
From: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:03:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGgd1OcF7V0XWen2rAySZcxpK97HU3Q9mPmYKgJaVMRaXOGs3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: rlb@ipv.sx, nolte@dfn-cert.de, jdkasten@umich.edu, cpu@letsencrypt.org, jsha@eff.org
Cc: rdd@cert.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, acme@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051bda6060e0967d7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/T1SsZ8f-YeBo1aw88LrMGUE1m0A>
Subject: Re: [Acme] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6103)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 12:03:36 -0000

This errata also had no responses.  In this case, I'd suggest rejecting it,
or making it editorial.  I don't think it affects how anyone would
implement or interpret the RFC.  But again, I'd like confirmation (or
correction).

Deb


On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:19 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6103
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Theodor Nolte <nolte@dfn-cert.de>
>
> Section: 7.1.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    o  A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3)
>
>    o  A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4)
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    o  A "newAccount" resource (Section 7.3)
>
>    o  A "newAuthz" resource (Section 7.4)
>
>    o  A "newOrder" resource (Section 7.4)
>
> Notes
> -----
> The item for the "newAuthz" resource is missing in the list of resources.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email