IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] change from Informational to Proposed Standard

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sat, 22 April 2023 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4C9C13AE32 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3a12ed4VF0cF for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179DCC13AE58 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu (c-73-169-244-254.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.169.244.254]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 33MI8MAC016540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Apr 2023 14:08:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1682186906; bh=9/cP5GUGgO/uNbdl0dSOb3lzde4BPrPSzDWPjaqXqNw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EgcyHn3YltI6++Y0K7P8Uxf91F+VuBBVmfdoDL0mz1nYsli3a3wt19A1RFEonAbCY 2q/DailwOGDiDZS5f/XKYIh508NcyisitgcJfGKyvuM+aBK77jw9+RlpFCJqaHJGjd 1QQSHW0huiw9ms5bmBPmYqxUlscJuBSADZS5h92qyIeLFhZGwTIXX2uvqqDEw7aO5H wsNUjndCff/ylcllamqNE8ApIfiGxAwaKFJy24vY6L+mehVJXQnidHgG2NMX72e8z4 3zYrazNLZhpwbArhDXc7vmIC9ywobqOl149byoWRtbqlXXgsaX2C8RtbGNtwfNXIbh Nqk30fmo9WiIQ==
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:08:22 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-acme-integrations@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZEQilv1wufLpYw8z@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAGgd1OdJv10Dyo0Lk9KepaOffHLJJnd__5ztPhm9cAMg194N0A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1OdJv10Dyo0Lk9KepaOffHLJJnd__5ztPhm9cAMg194N0A@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/1pMX0qHPjb1AYgaPI-FogHdi9V8>
Subject: Re: [Acme] change from Informational to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 18:08:31 -0000

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 07:46:43AM -0400, Deb Cooley wrote:
> ACME,
> 
> We are considering converting draft-ietf-acme-integrations from
> informational to standards track. If anyone objects, please reply on this
> list by 5 May 2023.

Could we say a little more in this thread about why we want to make this
change?  The draft currently states explicitly "[t]his draft is informational
and makes no changes to the referenced specifications"; what new behaviors
is it important to have at standards-track level of maturity?

Thanks,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email