Re: [Acme] Specify which JWS serialization is used

Jörn Heissler <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de> Sun, 04 March 2018 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C5A1243F3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 03:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmsg5tcIJHfl for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 03:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lvps87-230-93-31.dedicated.hosteurope.de (kappa.tutnicht.de [87.230.93.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9235120454 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 03:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.255.0.6] (helo=carrot.tutnicht.de) by lvps87-230-93-31.dedicated.hosteurope.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de>) id 1esSCT-0006Q2-VH for acme@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2018 12:53:10 +0100
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 12:53:08 +0100
From: Jörn Heissler <acme-specs@joern.heissler.de>
To: acme@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180304115308.GF2161@carrot.tutnicht.de>
References: <20180103230734.GM21695@carrot.tutnicht.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rCwQ2Y43eQY6RBgR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180103230734.GM21695@carrot.tutnicht.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/6CYOl464jAByMMZqLDKWL0p24nM>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Specify which JWS serialization is used
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 11:53:13 -0000

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 00:07:34 +0100, Jörn Heissler wrote:
> https://ietf-wg-acme.github.io/acme/draft-ietf-acme-acme.html#rfc.section.6.2
> states:
> 
>     In the examples below, JWS objects are shown in the JSON or
>     flattened JSON serialization
> 
> All examples in the ACME specification use only the flattened serialization.

I opened a PR for this: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/406