Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port
Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> Thu, 03 December 2015 00:48 UTC
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1338B1AD1BA for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:48:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9j1jPJkqjaw for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:48:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9432F1A03A0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:48:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1449103722; l=802; s=domk; d=kelunik.com; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version; bh=RZnTlwyehjU2rws3FS2oIMB8EPOKqgjo68GtFkZFEik=; b=c0Tcba8StO+E5HLzM4+XvY431Ofdxd4Yj0Kj54u/q1uIMFKFXA13McnOsq8XScCPcGC 5vy4hszhM4XDErOUhFWy58kY1xSbNv6vf3jykR+LG4559FsUAI4yZjou01/1FHg7LTEid B/ASUvlnMkU2c+4uVpJaxbQKOAzIgLDmVRU=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLGvomb4bl9EfHtO3I6
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id R069ebrB30mgNwa (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 01:48:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so4150120wmv.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:48:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.88.102 with SMTP id bf6mr8757108wjb.129.1449103722616; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.22.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:48:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m3mvtsid8r.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
References: <565589E4.2030107@desy.de> <565EBF56.3070502@desy.de> <D836A378-DA88-4AAF-B1E4-F34A80319DC1@gmail.com> <e9092589f3204a449af8b6f900be1303@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAL02cgQPZrx5d1xO-xKEQrV+pZKLkhYW_XDSm=QM8THs__s5qQ@mail.gmail.com> <m3si3kih5s.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <CAL02cgTSXqK7sR_Lrfu94PTkqPZf1+ZOkBHrSgWCP05OwehVbQ@mail.gmail.com> <m3mvtsid8r.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:48:42 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDCjoVNKWkQjHKFY-kmoywjSaioW2ieC+32HjkXE5_Civ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDCjoVNKWkQjHKFY-kmoywjSaioW2ieC+32HjkXE5_Civ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bf19872a124050525f3c0c6"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/HjKvRgQGdVUmTcVkNUkdrc_NQr8>
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Paul Millar <paul.millar@desy.de>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:48:48 -0000
> > Let's Encrypt is still a future CA, not a current one. > Nope, it's not a future CA, it's a current one. It already issues trusted certificates.
- [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Paul Millar
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port moparisthebest
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port moparisthebest
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Roland Zink
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Paul Millar
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Rob Stradling
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Rob Stradling
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Paul Millar
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Yoav Nir
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Romain Fliedel
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Romain Fliedel
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port James Cloos
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port James Cloos
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Eric Mill
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Darren J Moffat
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Rob Stradling
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Ángel González
- Re: [Acme] Server on >= 1024 port Vincent Lynch