[Acme] ACME draft is now in WGLC.

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E248129D84 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:28:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zx7Q-Frn9_NE for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4B612956C for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain []) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412943344A for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com []) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8623A433401 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1486488490; bh=C0bch5rG1kgHCvgvGjMEHGbrgjP+wyouD2DKPyUaCa4=; l=1512; h=From:To:Date:From; b=Aqj5PhOSOxuDqBa2eRbEV5z/LOpCpPoNOe/Mlr9HaDMOBAGjsIAbJXbMdP+M/xCJm RprWmqzCsCiqtPPz9tLcxhrNMRDSX58jKRb1//PoMH7RTIlU5NSpsXDzOT6YKQ6ZyI pvNe4HJH5bXyUVGnzO0nTrFd0JysBQ44v7yBD+iQ=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com []) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FD41FC90 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:28:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ( by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:27:49 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:27:49 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ACME draft is now in WGLC.
Thread-Index: AdKBZ2LP4XWB1i0uR++KFKjfHhNLwg==
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:27:48 +0000
Message-ID: <8473d9ba84894d49b2f2232370d66b46@usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/HmtCaSZyEendpS76MWTWQ9trWJE>
Subject: [Acme] ACME draft is now in WGLC.
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:28:13 -0000

I put the time period as six weeks, which takes us to just around IETF-98...

PLEASE reply on list if you will review and/or are interested in working on interop. 
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz

-----Original Message-----
From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:26 PM
To: draft-ietf-acme-acme@ietf.org; acme-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-acme-acme

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-acme-acme has been changed to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Rich Salz:


As we agreed at IETF-97 (Seoul), we will have a slightly longer WGLC period to encourage implementations and interop.

Are there any volunteers to read and review this document?  Please post to acme@ietf.org.

Does anyone have an implementation in progress and would be interested in doing interop at the IETF Hackathon at IETF-98 in Chicago?  Please post to acme@ietf.org