IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] New STAR draft

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 23 September 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19E120020 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZsdeEadL7Y2 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4578012000F for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8NK2qE8006695; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:04:13 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=YHtMeozmKJrkZ6FbQSI8pePkc1behx9vvsVo6VNRYvQ=; b=ffoQySZQIZo5T+MmGwP45ur6Y6/lYKQnbUFMocFqKD70pOCmFsx5GHNyc12kkI6l7GyU FVn6qovAnUWoNgN5b8qQKBpbkHaunT81XclXtx2h8WwG9VSdcteHC6DU4ai0BuhqKS7f DlIjppGGvJTsrsqn6pF/y7mVvISrJS2MC+hJ/WrNvXOD20pbKWQ58JDpeMKlEWYQeO4H JJHzezJ5grwjFqKZi3x4S2v8+bWaRKwUptJNQLTj1/GiSGJS7PkmN6O9/2ftXLGGusr2 N3P3LiD0q0GRO5B0a9JDT1v96DZW/wo9Cxl5bkl+gPVOFw/nKUn51U/5QoxboKCH6imD Jg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v73qb06xb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:04:13 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8NK2O46022591; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:04:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2v73vprbpx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:04:12 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:04:03 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:04:03 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] New STAR draft
Thread-Index: AQHVckoMFC6xjGk+d0uQ9aOlUQqWlA==
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:04:03 +0000
Message-ID: <9E5E73FB-0221-4791-87FA-DA0431460B0A@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5E3A14067615DF4CBCBA3DC241097916@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909230167
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-23_07:2019-09-23,2019-09-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1909230167
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/IyRDFAvV6GgzhlqXdZ6pjs-AC_E>
Subject: Re: [Acme] New STAR draft
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:04:18 -0000

Hearing no complaints, the modifications in the current draft pass the abbreviated second WGLC.

Roman, how do you want to handle the next step?

On 9/20/19, 11:05 AM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

    Reminder, please speak up by Monday or we will call consensus.
    
    On 9/17/19, 1:17 PM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
    
        This came up during IESG/IETF last calls.
        
        Most of the changes are editorial, such as changing some of the field names in the JSON structures etc (e.g., recurrent to auto-renewal). But a couple are operational and CA/B forum compliance.
        
        Quoting the summary of changes:
        			   o  STAR Order and Directory Meta attributes renamed slightly and	
        		 	      grouped under two brand new "auto-renewal" objects;	
        		 	   o  IANA registration updated accordingly (note that two new	
        		 	      registries have been added as a consequence);	
        		 	   o  Unbounded pre-dating of certificates removed so that STAR certs	
        		 	      are never issued with their notBefore in the past;	
        		 	   o  Changed "recurrent" to "autoRenewal" in error codes;	
        		 	   o  Changed "recurrent" to "auto-renewal" in reference to Orders;	
        		 	   o  Added operational considerations for HTTP caches.
        
        If anyone in the working group dislikes these changes, please speak up by Monday.
        
        Thanks.
        
        	/r$, co-chair
        
        On 9/17/19, 11:02 AM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
        
            
            A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-acme-star:
            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-acme-star-09.txt
            
            
            The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
            https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-star/
            
            Diff from previous version:
            https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-star-09
            
            Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
            until the diff is available at tools.ietf.org.
            
            IETF Secretariat.
            
            
        
        
    
    _______________________________________________
    Acme mailing list
    Acme@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email