Re: [Acme] New STAR draft
Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 25 September 2019 00:05 UTC
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABCB1201AA for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoKCudPb5RJM for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF6CB120033 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8P059FZ012930; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:05:09 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x8P059FZ012930
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1569369910; bh=/FTLCbs9IloN4Dd1/lRMQJUquT/fG9TTqwI5upNHaqo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PKECoPODcaCEk54TOsHrNuWLfqrphyttTg1G8S+SAx3Vo+juNkyE4+JsChPoSk00a wUohlPAWiT8uqrqqKUhHP741yur5YirGbfkgeEN2RoqowXGbaaaTVV8/+kpkdSCmGF uykF1j6eVKeS+D3yK+Ul7QEeK+slms6gcmbhJQHA=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8P055h3004748; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:05:05 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:05:05 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
CC: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] New STAR draft
Thread-Index: AQHVckoMFC6xjGk+d0uQ9aOlUQqWlKc7hONA
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3466CD5@marathon>
References: <9E5E73FB-0221-4791-87FA-DA0431460B0A@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E5E73FB-0221-4791-87FA-DA0431460B0A@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/L6PLhTVFmv7EfrZlCeHpUESlPf0>
Subject: Re: [Acme] New STAR draft
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:05:17 -0000
Hi! > -----Original Message----- > From: Salz, Rich [mailto:rsalz@akamai.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 4:04 PM > To: acme@ietf.org; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> > Subject: Re: [Acme] New STAR draft > > Hearing no complaints, the modifications in the current draft pass the > abbreviated second WGLC. > > Roman, how do you want to handle the next step? I appreciate the updates to the draft. These were worth making. I've advanced the document to be on next week's telechat. Roman > On 9/20/19, 11:05 AM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote: > > Reminder, please speak up by Monday or we will call consensus. > > On 9/17/19, 1:17 PM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote: > > This came up during IESG/IETF last calls. > > Most of the changes are editorial, such as changing some of the field > names in the JSON structures etc (e.g., recurrent to auto-renewal). But a > couple are operational and CA/B forum compliance. > > Quoting the summary of changes: > o STAR Order and Directory Meta attributes > renamed slightly and > grouped under two brand new "auto-renewal" > objects; > o IANA registration updated accordingly (note that > two new > registries have been added as a consequence); > > o Unbounded pre-dating of certificates removed so > that STAR certs > are never issued with their notBefore in the past; > > o Changed "recurrent" to "autoRenewal" in error > codes; > o Changed "recurrent" to "auto-renewal" in > reference to Orders; > o Added operational considerations for HTTP > caches. > > If anyone in the working group dislikes these changes, please speak up > by Monday. > > Thanks. > > /r$, co-chair > > On 9/17/19, 11:02 AM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet- > drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > > A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-acme-star: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-acme-star-09.txt > > > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-star/ > > Diff from previous version: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-star-09 > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the diff is available at tools.ietf.org. > > IETF Secretariat. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
- [Acme] New STAR draft Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] New STAR draft Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] New STAR draft Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] New STAR draft Roman Danyliw