Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 14 May 2015 18:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00861B2DE6 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UX_gPj7iSZjY for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FA811B2DDB for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so84569210wgi.0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HRsv4zklXcU7cWCyykZA14LScm9K6D7g6xG3I8wjWJw=; b=LrTJv9FKHEq0amevCEywTat5kq34gZ8q9ojIN6HUNa4QnTtj7uVC5zi1omyJ+pnOyS tH55EZnYDCX0Og159ODrErCNwF2fmJZzXDmi12yuXoRqCIrilZ18YwiRUaYvbxnsTviT aQeIBBne7c94Wrz0+sy38neEYhB02ttVlbApqsIZrPHyRGNy1nkmtIiD+lV4z0dzOO6K w3oC3ij7KKsdZPECMshmmH4rJGjrnWb6/XsKmh0zLu35mmH+rMvX9RSDMtkqK04UhqqX t2qdulN/vM451JugaRU822t8anfElJHGqVt0WevAlRUdyqr4Pg0nPkYsEWcOQr+CWhKs 2haA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.84.168 with SMTP id a8mr11266533wiz.40.1431627983316; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.185.171 with HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-X-i-8cAYLBUGcZLiOVrjOcr2z0FvNCKzp-ZCe9yVFTSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDB_sc6NLc4zqJAYZq6ELjHCd=6g_9CyH6zTH2cK+0apQ@mail.gmail.com> <36ae09b7c2bf4d60baca1e8d8ba9fd44@ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20150514165733.GA1376@eff.org> <CABtrr-X-i-8cAYLBUGcZLiOVrjOcr2z0FvNCKzp-ZCe9yVFTSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:26:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMC2xhaBATctbWk=Ft6T7fQoh1GcudfwO3rp9QsDwCUFXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d041827f265694805160edd47"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/KhlRGKeHzO0AOBl-WddHc_ZWQC8>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Peter Eckersley <pde@eff.org>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:26:26 -0000
Hi Joe, On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote: > > Heya, this reads as if the IETF WG work should block on the > letsencrypt launch and it seemed pretty clear in Dallas that while > letsencrypt is a motivating effort to spin up ACME that neither should > in the short-term be very eeply dependent on each other. (and this is > coming from someone who is very excited about both efforts) > > Yep, the minutes from Dallas confirm that folks are interested in getting the WG going, with no mention of blocking while waiting for initial deployment. Kathleen has confirmed that this is her understanding as well, so I think our steps are: Get charter done & approved Start working group Fork draft-barnes to draft-ietf Reconverge when draft-ietf progresses. regards, Ted > Happy to be corrected if this was a misinterpretation or a mistake on my > part. > > best, Joe > > > -- > > Peter Eckersley pde@eff.org > > Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131 > > Electronic Frontier Foundation Fax +1 415 436 9993 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Acme mailing list > > Acme@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > > > > -- > Joseph Lorenzo Hall > Chief Technologist > Center for Democracy & Technology > 1634 I ST NW STE 1100 > Washington DC 20006-4011 > (p) 202-407-8825 > (f) 202-637-0968 > joe@cdt.org > PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key > fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 >
- [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language hallam
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Songhaibin (A)
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Dr. Pala
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ben Laurie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Bernd Eckenfels
- [Acme] PKIX "standards" Re: Proposed ACME Charter… Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Randy Bush
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Peter Eckersley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Ted Hardie
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Russ Housley
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Paul Winkeler
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language Michael Ströder