IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] ACME interm meeting poll

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Wed, 10 May 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=03034381bb=jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC5712DDD2 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neustar.biz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFx29rSkTR5h for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947B4129C1E for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 10:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0078666.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v4AHj7aI007776; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:45:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=61yNMMvsXCc09QB6yJpgn6q54sCEhgUF0TFsidc/vnU=; b=bxZWhpvOhrI6Tu7DsebPfTczRDbByUEMcax2t2tNgqGmmgmE3JmcuESgxkcn2ubaPOLg WkLiD9Ww9NMV2hR7zlSjYsVCWZQQNcSP2epi5ZU+t1uefvcOFreHXtNv61SzseKwE5Dm JXmk8HyiCpIoV4nMjqd3vRM/AEJ/UBRYPDy7ui78Eae2ODGq6xbJmORFR4KAmER6P7k6 XJRU1gXacUO8RwwemzGlL0ZtwmWf0kuBZ26D3D8ynG4njxSdyH+ZIv9MvFMqVWdW7eqI hwup43HsWKIJZJjPPB2oA39OsZDv34fMpnVxJVLwxR93DTlIJIV9wIIzD+v76hwIunQg kA==
Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2a9akr7yvm-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 May 2017 13:45:56 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.33]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:45:55 -0400
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, ACME WG <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] ACME interm meeting poll
Thread-Index: AQHSybVFtJISGs1HQFePQCpVZ1P8Fw==
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:45:54 +0000
Message-ID: <D538C03D.1D9985%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-originating-ip: [10.96.12.234]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D538C03D1D9985jonpetersonneustarbiz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-10_14:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705100121
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/QMsl6v0oaD60g7Uk21zX2kecIz8>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME interm meeting poll
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 17:46:02 -0000

To the degree that barnes-acme-service-provider-00 belongs here, probably peterson-acme-telephone does as well. I mean, certs in STIR kind of have two special ways of identifying their scope, and these two drafts are reflections of those two ways.  Anyway, happy to discuss in the interim/call.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

From: Acme <acme-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:acme-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com<mailto:rsalz@akamai.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM
To: ACME WG <acme@ietf.org<mailto:acme@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Acme] ACME interm meeting poll

We are trying to decide if we should meet in Prague.  To help make the decision, we are holding a Doodle poll for a one-hour virtual interim.  Please go here and vote:
http://doodle.com/poll/u56c5xwr7nb23wqe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_u56c5xwr7nb23wqe&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Cm-3rdBk7U0hkO2Z4rSnHP2FLmdzG0QvDYFWdT4pbvc&s=rWhPFLi-ekk_9TFp-4GMVVJjPa9oyWqqNOAepZozw-I&e=>

The main ACME draft is essentially done, and should enter a second WGLC soon.  That alone would not justify a meeting.

In the early message thread that was labeled “Futures” the following possible work items came up:
                Hugo’s CAA draft (already adopted, short, might be ready for WGLC) -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-caa-01

The following drafts are possible calls for adoption:
                Yaron Sheffer et al draft on STAR -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-acme-star-lurk-00
                Mary Barnes on an ACME challenge for ATIS/SIP -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-00
                Roland Shoemaker on an ACME challenge for validating IP addresses -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shoemaker-acme-ip-00

In addition, Alexey is interested in helping with an ACME challenge for email certificates. Is anyone else interested in helping to draft drafting?

We would like to know if people are interested in adopting, advancing, working-on these drafts within the ACME WG. And if anyone will commit to working on any of them.  If so, then we will discuss them in Prague, and have a re-chartering discussion to cover this new work.

Please see the Doodle poll and mark your availability.

For the good of the order,
                /r$

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email