[Acme] ACME interm meeting poll

["Salz, Rich" <[e-mail]>]

We are trying to decide if we should meet in Prague.  To help make the decision, we are holding a Doodle poll for a one-hour virtual interim.  Please go here and vote:
http://doodle.com/poll/u56c5xwr7nb23wqe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__doodle.com_poll_u56c5xwr7nb23wqe&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Cm-3rdBk7U0hkO2Z4rSnHP2FLmdzG0QvDYFWdT4pbvc&s=rWhPFLi-ekk_9TFp-4GMVVJjPa9oyWqqNOAepZozw-I&e=>

The main ACME draft is essentially done, and should enter a second WGLC soon.  That alone would not justify a meeting.

In the early message thread that was labeled “Futures” the following possible work items came up:
                Hugo’s CAA draft (already adopted, short, might be ready for WGLC) -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-acme-caa-01

The following drafts are possible calls for adoption:
                Yaron Sheffer et al draft on STAR -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-acme-star-lurk-00
                Mary Barnes on an ACME challenge for ATIS/SIP -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-00
                Roland Shoemaker on an ACME challenge for validating IP addresses -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shoemaker-acme-ip-00

In addition, Alexey is interested in helping with an ACME challenge for email certificates. Is anyone else interested in helping to draft drafting?

We would like to know if people are interested in adopting, advancing, working-on these drafts within the ACME WG. And if anyone will commit to working on any of them.  If so, then we will discuss them in Prague, and have a re-chartering discussion to cover this new work.

Please see the Doodle poll and mark your availability.

For the good of the order,
                /r$