IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Thu, 20 October 2022 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B79C1522C8 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Rd_MP6269MK for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AAFC14F738 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E46E39D9; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1476B207A0; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-6932-1665778982-640.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1217636@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-23216-1638223672-731.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-18610-1642703569-1535.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <5A571C1A-0E27-4232-AE69-DAEE0D3AAD68@viagenie.ca> <rt-4.4.3-11879-1643051803-941.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-20370-1643151036-507.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F98020B1CF85A@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com> <757176fe08d9441194e932b435df8751@jhuapl.edu> <rt-4.4.3-6932-1665778982-640.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-15704-1666307688-1489.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1217636
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu
CC: rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com, marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca, kscott@mitre.org, acme@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:14:49 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/_Yc5O9DrgpEcADsXoFY0VZ4DcXE>
Subject: [Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:14:53 -0000

Dear Bundle Administrative Record Types experts (cc: acme WG),

Resending this question about a new bundle registry field in a document on next Thursday's telechat agenda.

If the document continues to include the new "Protocol Version" field, but doesn't tell us to add the field to the registry (which also requires that we be told how to populate it for existing entries), we'll have to mark the document "IANA NOT OK."

thanks,
Amanda

On Fri Oct 14 20:23:02 2022, amanda.baber wrote:
> Dear bundle experts and DTN chairs,
> 
> This document, listed on the IESG's October 27th telechat agenda, asks
> us to add an entry to the Bundle Administrative Record Types registry
> that would include a "Protocol Version" field:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid
> 
> However, that field isn't currently part of the registry:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bundle/bundle.xhtml#admin-record-
> types
> 
> We need a document that a) creates the field and b) populates it for
> existing entries so that we can list it as an additional reference for
> the registry itself. Can that be done through this document?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Operations Manager

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email