[Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Fri, 21 October 2022 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EE8C14CE3C for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F68e8kOQz97R for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E5FC14CF06 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09937E3A01; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 06DA920603; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-23397-1666309449-129.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1217636@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-23216-1638223672-731.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-18610-1642703569-1535.1217636-9-0@icann.org> <5A571C1A-0E27-4232-AE69-DAEE0D3AAD68@viagenie.ca> <38A5475DE83986499AEACD2CFAFC3F98020B1CF85A@tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com> <757176fe08d9441194e932b435df8751@jhuapl.edu> <rt-4.4.3-6932-1665778982-640.1217636-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-15704-1666307688-1489.1217636-37-0@icann.org> <A8519EF5-CC52-4DD6-AC25-5952233AE1E6@viagenie.ca> <rt-4.4.3-23397-1666309449-129.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-18550-1666310822-209.1217636-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1217636
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu
CC: acme@ietf.org, marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca, kscott@mitre.org, rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:07:02 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/xh_53jXdO2218tU2mU2fPTxKYLw>
Subject: [Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:07:07 -0000

Thanks, Marc. I've sent a message to the document's authors, chairs, and ADs.

Amanda

On Thu Oct 20 23:44:09 2022, marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca wrote:
> I think this request should be in the hands of the DTN co-chairs or
> the author to add additional text to the document or have another
> document. I don’t think, as one of the two designated expert for that
> registry, it is us, the designated experts, to decide a new structure
> of the registry (while I do have my own opinion on how to do it).
> While it may slow down the publication of that document, I guess you
> could put that state and someone will follow up and I guess the draft
> will be in revised ID needed until that issue is resolved.
> 
> My 2 cents.
> 
> Marc.
> 
> > Le 20 oct. 2022 à 19:14, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-
> > review@iana.org> a écrit :
> >
> > Dear Bundle Administrative Record Types experts (cc: acme WG),
> >
> > Resending this question about a new bundle registry field in a
> > document on next Thursday's telechat agenda.
> >
> > If the document continues to include the new "Protocol Version"
> > field, but doesn't tell us to add the field to the registry (which
> > also requires that we be told how to populate it for existing
> > entries), we'll have to mark the document "IANA NOT OK."
> >
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> >
> > On Fri Oct 14 20:23:02 2022, amanda.baber wrote:
> >> Dear bundle experts and DTN chairs,
> >>
> >> This document, listed on the IESG's October 27th telechat agenda,
> >> asks
> >> us to add an entry to the Bundle Administrative Record Types
> >> registry
> >> that would include a "Protocol Version" field:
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid
> >>
> >> However, that field isn't currently part of the registry:
> >>
> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bundle/bundle.xhtml#admin-record-
> >> types
> >>
> >> We need a document that a) creates the field and b) populates it for
> >> existing entries so that we can list it as an additional reference
> >> for
> >> the registry itself. Can that be done through this document?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> Amanda Baber
> >> IANA Operations Manager
> >