[Acme] IETF 107; agenda

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CA93A120A for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgCDGOp4P3wD for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73A033A11F4 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 08:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net []) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. ( with SMTP id 029F0FaL017404; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:11:11 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=R3WYz1HyGE3xc76AeemkCTWgllgDYIg4VgrC8My/l8M=; b=FNNNfiMN+tDUvag3jXh8XubhQYuagJgYvjhpJ08rffChQQJLSNitWHfSiaIIkRUh1BF/ uiiOYRMVRAAxDR5r5eufNGfwk9SxKFEX5blUHg7lJtSZ+yjocHLULh8mhWJHlKJVgcUm by/cVO9d53z05tnoYI8dvsYxN1MHnO2sPD2114vFW2D56RgJwg8TG5zQkLHufZQIX0VD gJ/fS1tqhvRG+IfsRCvEZxuGvn95gbzJfpbvrC5LwGB+VT2YuMzSkinfOFjdQOf38Df3 IUirmYequyqwoGCLIs2Pbfw501U+/HjqyCRWRfiBUiGV/MteKV1UvwVtHBdbzknz12Pr iA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ym4weg2fu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:11:11 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com []) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com ( with SMTP id 029F259B014394; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:11:09 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ym7u0na7h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 11:11:09 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ( by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:11:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:11:08 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
CC: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: IETF 107; agenda
Thread-Index: AQHV9iT1nCNmGh3yW0yLOf0+RNFFUg==
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:11:08 +0000
Message-ID: <2737DD9A-53F6-4F03-AD30-0FC582E32501@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20022603
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4E59668AEDA32B41857F51D5CE94ABA6@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_06:2020-03-09, 2020-03-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=825 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2003090104
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_06:2020-03-09, 2020-03-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=812 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003090104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/_bUKqt7wfJnoDWrApmfYXqLEF0Y>
Subject: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:11:15 -0000

Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote.  We have volunteers to act as chairs for us (on CC).  Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to cancel our session.  PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE.  Of course "they" may decide to cancel anyway, but please post your opinion here.

Let’s look at the documents in our queue and see which need time at IETF 107.  See https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/acme/documents/ to link to the document.

draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-04, ACME Challenges Using an Authority Token -and-
draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-05,  TNAuthList profile of ACME Authority Token
	Any update from the authors?  Is this ready for WGLC?
	This has never had much in-person discussion, and the domain expertise is in STIR

draft-ietf-acme-client-00, ACME End User Client and Code Signing Certificates
	Any updates?  This was recently adopted by the WG.

draft-ietf-acme-integrations-00, ACME Integrations
	Michael Richardson can present.

	Michael Richardson can present; this is a topic for WG adoption

draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-06, Extensions to Automatic Certificate Management Environment for end user S/MIME certificates
	Any updates?  Ready for WGLC?

draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-03, An ACME Profile for Generating Delegated STAR Certificates
	Yaron just pushed a new update.  Does this need F2F time?  The main document (draft-ietf-acme-star-11,  Support for Short-Term, Automatically-Renewed (STAR) Certificates in Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) is already in IESG review and probably wants this one to be in the same bundle.)