IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] ACME draft is now in WGLC.

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6388A129497 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfuD6DZkZsLj for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92F512944F for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4636A433434 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:17:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F79D433431 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:17:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1489436226; bh=YRqZMgurloRQNVCYaDCKF05iUJLNP7E5ctrXpktXXoU=; l=405; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lNBu5fgjYurgEbQOjgOla3GEr95P/9sZUYLPvsLxaZTEvvpZoYuTY1ULJxnOYQpsU U5JFcrexdKqw0/2KLJcTgWu6LWnqlUSJ3eL9X6rYE2OCvFBjQc5+mbGEFc1Pfs2in3 7Nm5gJG61c/P7afxaN1TTJ1N4HPLlLgCkXXPn6Qw=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ecp.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7181FC8D for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:17:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:17:05 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:17:05 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] ACME draft is now in WGLC.
Thread-Index: AdKBZ2LP4XWB1i0uR++KFKjfHhNLwgVs43eAAAAufoAACZkPwAFFdgwAAAhZUVA=
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:17:05 +0000
Message-ID: <12461433fb264865972e9ddafab1c511@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <8473d9ba84894d49b2f2232370d66b46@usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20170307031510.GN7733@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20170307032023.GO7733@mournblade.imrryr.org> <9471a5323a98405eaf0ee111fb0350b0@usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20170313201410.GG4095@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170313201410.GG4095@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/jzwXLSjDcYnV9hMpyN7pVix0eNk>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME draft is now in WGLC.
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:17:08 -0000

> Rumour has it that CAA will soon be a requirement

It just passed their balloting so CA/B forum now requires it.  See the LAMPS WG thread(s) on CAA erratum 4515.

> The CAA check is/was easy to make and crippling it
> by not making it a requirement was IMNSHO a mistake.
...
> I urge the WG to reconsider.

Does anyone else agree with Viktor?  Please speak up on the list this week if so.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email