Re: [Acme] key agility?
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 18 December 2014 23:41 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244551A87AD for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJU2NuQZeOlX for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05AD1A9165 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id gd6so1926141lab.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b1iYpN3mR/swtjOA39iIm5OPsKV3PjVvRP6dj8Bmgpg=; b=sqiWtORlhAK6QiPNQ86av9WJbN3qT1IewNIv8DpQU5HCIRf+vT//gB+zbhfb8yQVsI MAHUH+ac1isHddyfugroWGIhp9i9ylISL/qX+iHZmPo9oPjrctrU9fzRW5ihNgz5jKoj kle8eSwrshnAnVAmg5G4mXegXgEB1qycNC8owKQqhS9ZaO1diFaB8NGUsv+FX5MuiHo1 Uyh4QOANr4WAANyhGbluvI7r+cMONfkKU1pAZMCQ2hRZ+TkqEALVDJuStVr14B3bBdCy 9VgvXEjc/Huml+xRF/ewK/DJqtb5GZHTls8br7Uixu1x0ztcD4qArudZyvXqWPbmJkQL iu6A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.51.44 with SMTP id h12mr4875855lbo.5.1418946071306; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.19.42 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54933EC2.3010104@gmail.com>
References: <54933EC2.3010104@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:41:11 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nV8qYi23Ajsm7Z3W0iEgYnwMbPk
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi-SeaKfHxXxmG8vsbMK09uvZxs_-y9vQW82U9VB0hGiw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113339288928e3050a862061"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/qdXOPhu9y8F5lOggFYj_FxNHypg
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] key agility?
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:41:23 -0000
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > > With a multi-step protocol some kind of key agility should be possible to > support. > The client could for example start with telling its > preferences/capabilities. > > Anders > I do not know what you mean here.
- [Acme] key agility? Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Acme] key agility? Richard Barnes