Re: [Acme] Terms of service agreement changes

[Ron <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:25:26PM -0700, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote:
> Any further objections to this?
> 
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/167/files

Aside from Eric's remarks, I'm also not too keen on a blanket
"terms-of-service": "agreed", since there's no indication there
of what you've actually "agreed" to.

I don't think this should be a binary (unary?) switch.


> On 08/09/2016 12:50 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote:
> > On 08/09/2016 12:42 PM, Ron wrote:
> >>>  - If the CA uses legal auto-update language (most common case by far),
> >>> nothing else is required.
> >>
> >> I think in this case we should specify that the CA MUST notify the user
> >> of this via the ACME protocol (ie. by changing the ToS URL or similar).
> > 
> > I'm fine with saying that the directory's terms-of-service URL should
> > always be up-to-date with the latest ToS, *if* the CA is using ACME for
> > ToS agreement.
> > 
> > 
> > I suspect for most paid CAs, ToS agreement will already have been
> > handled out-of-band, for instance when submitting payment information.