[Actn] ACTN progress
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 19:11 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: actn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: actn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35C81ACE75 for <actn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:11:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0ivMFzPXXHs for <actn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:11:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9D51ACE71 for <actn@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:11:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOA91937; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:39 +0000
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.225]) by dfweml702-chm ([10.193.5.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:11:30 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "actn@ietf.org" <actn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ACTN progress
Thread-Index: AQHQMC3nFYnz2qkEM02e+cimG8VM+g==
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:30 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C719C6@dfweml706-chm>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C70587@dfweml706-chm> <eecc34a2c82e438fb09897d328c03d0a@ATL-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com>
In-Reply-To: <eecc34a2c82e438fb09897d328c03d0a@ATL-SRV-MBX1.advaoptical.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.120]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C719C6dfweml706chm_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/actn/NAVSyd-q4EuyPpAI4vsswz9RPFw>
Subject: [Actn] ACTN progress
X-BeenThere: actn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks \(ACTN\)" <actn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/actn>, <mailto:actn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/actn/>
List-Post: <mailto:actn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:actn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/actn>, <mailto:actn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:45 -0000
Hi All, Just wanted to share some private emails exchanged among a limited interested parties in the past week with a permission with Igor. In a nutshell, I think we are converging with a common view on ACTN interfaces and architecture. Please check the following email thread. Please comment if you have any question. Thanks, Young From: Igor Bryskin [mailto:IBryskin@advaoptical.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:13 PM To: Leeyoung; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: AshwoodsmithPeter Subject: RE: Recap this morning's call Hi Young, You've captured all pretty accurately. I nominate you for the ACTN scribe job :=) Igor From: Leeyoung [mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:09 PM To: Igor Bryskin; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: AshwoodsmithPeter Subject: Recap this morning's call Hi Igor, Thanks for this morning's call. I just wanted to recap what was agreed upon. Please feel free to correct if anything needs to be corrected. We have identified several models to be implemented in ACTN control hierarchy (CNC-MDSC-PNC). Among them are, but not limited to: 1. Topology Model 2. Provisioning Model 3. Service Model 4. OAM Model 5. Client Mapping/Policy Model There could be more to the list. We can identify and add later on if we will. Now, with these models, different components (i.e., different controller type) will implement whatever relevant models and support its interfaces. For instance, PNC may need not support Client mapping/policy model while CNC may not need to support Provisioning model. We also agree that MDSC can interface another MDSC or PNCs with transparency. MDSC should not be able to distinguish if it interfaces MDSC or PNCs (i.e., the same interface). And you also said, CNC interfacing MDSC should be essentially the same interface as MDSC interfacing another MDSC or PNCs. Let us start from here. Then we can discuss further. Thanks, Young
- [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- [Actn] 答复: ACTN progress Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress 윤빈영
- [Actn] 答复: ACTN progress Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress 윤빈영
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Dhruv Dhody
- [Actn] 答复: ACTN progress Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Actn] 答复: ACTN progress Dhruv Dhody
- [Actn] R: 答复: ACTN progress Daniele Ceccarelli
- [Actn] 答复: 答复: ACTN progress Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress 윤빈영
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Actn] 答复: 答复: ACTN progress Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Dave Hood
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress 윤빈영
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Actn] ACTN progress BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Leeyoung
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Arashmid Akhavain
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Dave Hood
- [Actn] 答复: MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) 윤빈영
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Zhangxian (Xian)
- [Actn] R: MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Daniele Ceccarelli
- [Actn] R: MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Dave Hood
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Actn] MSDC-PNC m:n (was R: ACTN progress) Arashmid Akhavain