Re: [Add] Draft-pp-add-resinfo

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A888E3A142E for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rufpKfBmIr5s for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E1F3A142D for <add@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id e11so14806163otk.4 for <add@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dun0g7gJp7gFKEe23ldH/t6mlTlnVUniuZhz/Uxz3PY=; b=WEiIgniypbSEn7XeORHagwQexDemsbRpQ4SudnJTkKgJZY68HEnz791Ph4l7RbTMUo nqzm2QMsa/7LFi7kW+3lqKsmODW4Q70/iCS2eFQmNLb13l141MJ2Ced77IOrhrkC2WmS qjAl2sxllMOuwfG0AzpvDjsEQu+bBlvkEw9x/yfs19e0YCnekiLDN6KFW10laci+z6Sh jEUzaHgYtIEbm1gyaNlA3c0yS7TG0RJoXxC5diMbS6GdW6zH8BbRBLJAHYC9wiupB0lh lElP+JVlKv1ppqG9pRYFK/XyisJrUGWDdFHAMGHwNtMnl+wWXlQGOOej8O8I9pVDDX8T w6Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Dun0g7gJp7gFKEe23ldH/t6mlTlnVUniuZhz/Uxz3PY=; b=RJ6zHYaW4qkpplfBGBQa7cYZ3gTc7oxL2MCtgGK8/AnnhDvY5ownkIWr5DjL6pL+C4 LJWO9kjQpeGIsZCfCVC0cLdVSTa3ihHo0OyRixhQMrhiBnB/p18aMwoDZBs+KofyLRUx NeLIWoUDh+y9BvCyF5rTmvUp61ioz2NuXOeyKlV5PqXeynWHS7bCv+SulycwZ6+eNrqm tbsSsaTnJYqBvyqa2Dn2rCfMFNAuskSplyl3SpKQKnwnSDqTJFYqp+N0qzeXRRLDP7go pdvDU3vUophuEIca9kOt5K2Auz6ZCBRUo07QnmpCPDILJ1iu2J/wKKrMhavI/hNv9fca GUXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334oMuySk9mglIegcKxjAWmSJbuusM5ShZQQCOO5pgDweVc7MS0 y85oPAZD0W/kH8DucrJHXi/Rn+jDEVjrXqpCCUMLGnRg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyn0lEBAoFsfbchjzEXiAlOMjmYQ5tztBzNcIa008KhPpjmMBveNJnK/fOJ+T9nvQg9NwX1LKx343OPRR2Sh94=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:4008:: with SMTP id h8mr13110595ots.158.1597706097405; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B98873C4-2943-4D1B-B751-D7B3A6945323@comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <B98873C4-2943-4D1B-B751-D7B3A6945323@comcast.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:14:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GDGNTUxzTNwKXwPhBpsUBB583WSNUxUmM_7m=q8Ssppw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064334605ad1af0cf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/7wDTvmzdP0TCuvc-KOs4V5JL4Vw>
Subject: Re: [Add] Draft-pp-add-resinfo
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 23:15:01 -0000

The Resolver Info draft was originally adopted by DNSOP, so DNS people are
good with this work.
The registry it creates allows for more expressive information to be
extracted.  My only wish
is the authors could create several initial entries based on some of the
work they've done
implementing it.

tim


On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:40 PM Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen@comcast.com> wrote:

> Hi ADD,
>
>
>
> The responsible ADs and co-chairs for the various DNS WGs met recently to
> talk through where various drafts may fit better than where they were
> originally being discussed, and we wanted to suggest that the draft
> Draft-pp-add-resinfo which originally was being discussed on the DSNOPS
> list be discussed here on ADD as it’s a closer fit.       This has already
> been happening somewhat already, so this is mostly an attempt at
> clarification.
>
>
>
> This is not a WG adoption of the draft, just recognizing that the ADD list
> would be the best fit for the material in the draft.
>
>
>
> If anyone objects feel free to share your concerns.
>
>
>
> Draft link:  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pp-add-resinfo
>
>
>
>
>
> regards
>
> ADD WG Chairs, Glenn Deen & David Lawrence
>
>
> --
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>