IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft-pp-add-resinfo

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Mon, 17 August 2020 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829E3A09F0 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IcuCI3krcLyL for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A293A09EF for <add@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 07HJCtI8023122 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:12:58 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.595.3; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:12:54 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0595.003; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:12:54 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn_Deen@comcast.com>
CC: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Add] Draft-pp-add-resinfo
Thread-Index: AQHWdLUMPJsi9gPnKEytUcy0M6rB/ak9IL8A
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:12:54 +0000
Message-ID: <7C33E325-6DD0-4620-B66A-E71B412075A7@icann.org>
References: <B98873C4-2943-4D1B-B751-D7B3A6945323@comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <B98873C4-2943-4D1B-B751-D7B3A6945323@comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1648997F-0FE5-438D-887C-2CF3161DC5EE"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-17_14:2020-08-17, 2020-08-17 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/GxQD00qIr26duMD1hdj5k42Px6Y>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft-pp-add-resinfo
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:13:05 -0000

On Aug 17, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi ADD,
>  
> The responsible ADs and co-chairs for the various DNS WGs met recently to talk through where various drafts may fit better than where they were originally being discussed, and we wanted to suggest that the draft Draft-pp-add-resinfo which originally was being discussed on the DSNOPS list be discussed here on ADD as it’s a closer fit.       This has already been happening somewhat already, so this is mostly an attempt at clarification.   
>  
> This is not a WG adoption of the draft, just recognizing that the ADD list would be the best fit for the material in the draft.
>  
> If anyone objects feel free to share your concerns.

Not an objection, but two questions:

- Is there a time plan for the call for adoption of draft-pp-add-resinfo?

- What about draft-pp-add-stub-upgrade? Was that omitted from the message by accident, or did you assume that we would roll that text into draft-pp-add-resinfo, or ... ?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email