IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Thoughts on a DoH (and DoT) BCP?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 24 July 2019 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2348120142 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6PNizchro8B for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh04.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh04.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83BF61200D7 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) by emh04.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D2A3000E; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:24:43 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [172.20.4.41] (unknown [72.138.80.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27FB864DE90; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:24:37 +0300 (EEST)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <6DEE1859-6F28-414D-A746-191CB4501695@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_716A218C-62C3-48FD-9717-DE8266CD995A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:24:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxzHNQMS2E9JqdAVtsAAGXi4LoKx2kT5WqnFWNWQ9pRAA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: philippe.fouquart@orange.com, "andrew.fidler@bt.com" <andrew.fidler@bt.com>, "chris.box@bt.com" <chris.box@bt.com>, "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
References: <LO2P123MB2462DEB5330C313055D62CC396FB0@LO2P123MB2462.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <30950_1563958271_5D381BFF_30950_9_1_B5939C6860701C49AA39C5DA5189448B939E9268@OPEXCAUBMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAChr6SwzUdYALPRt-9B1-ThV0hd3SMbwojGEeNvV-e8EzARcgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxzHNQMS2E9JqdAVtsAAGXi4LoKx2kT5WqnFWNWQ9pRAA@mail.gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 27FB864DE90.A61E1
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/AwzJfR0-aBlRrpVuTFDSbJKIh60>
Subject: Re: [Add] Thoughts on a DoH (and DoT) BCP?
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:24:47 -0000

Rob,

On 2019-7-24, at 5:19, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> The folks from BT, AT&T, Orange, etc can all discuss their policies in some other venue, and I think that would be great.

please keep the discussion professional.

IETF results strongest when they receive the broadest possible input and review. This is often a difficult and sometimes painful (and long) process, but in the end, this is what makes our output stronger and more relevant than that of many other organizations.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email