[Add] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-11
Jiankang Yao via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 02 June 2024 03:35 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietf.org
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E51C14F695; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Jiankang Yao via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171729930120.24161.6084740749493881206@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 20:35:01 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: CUEOAFHTUXA4V3VUQDOWEUJVNKKXTNUA
X-Message-ID-Hash: CUEOAFHTUXA4V3VUQDOWEUJVNKKXTNUA
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: add@ietf.org, draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Subject: [Add] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-11
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/L3gFtc7y96unVSnv1tHj8sqM6NA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:add-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:add-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:add-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review result: Ready I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. The Art Area Review Team (ART-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-11 Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review Date: 2024-06-01 Summary: Ready for publication. This document is clear and in good shape. One suggestion: In section 2 Terminology, " Encrypted DNS A DNS protocol that provides an encrypted channel between a DNS client and server (e.g., DNS over TLS (DoT) [RFC7858], HTTPS (DoH) [RFC8484], QUIC (DoQ) [RFC9250]). Split-Horizon DNS The DNS service provided by a resolver that also acts as an authoritative server for some names, providing resolution results that are meaningfully different from those in the Global DNS. (See "Split DNS" in Section 6 of [RFC9499].) " Encrypted ‘DNS’ is defined as "Protocol" while Split-Horizon ‘DNS’ is defined as "service". Same "DNS" points to different things. How about changing "Encrypted DNS" to "Encrypted DNS Protocols"? Best Regards Jiankang Yao
- [Add] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-add-s… Jiankang Yao via Datatracker
- [Add] Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-a… tirumal reddy