IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] The ADD WG has placed draft-boucadair-add-deployment-considerations in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Fri, 15 October 2021 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F4A3A0CD0; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pbUG2yPKt1IK; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D06A3A0CCB; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19FM8anj006555; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:22 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=20180706; bh=GeMqUPJlgtLYPFgYNmI2vn41cXtfSpVTHu/epyr3hrs=; b=TDtNl3WeVyhlFYvc4lscQy6gPejvH+pgpXV1EUxj3Wbbg6cdxzUibXJj+1JJ0NDeCR5c K/QBqAKlc5WkEgHFbrdoXsdlljG+hLtoNcMit/2JuYb3Mbw59G6hWLswLYnpPbaNZqq2 0g1x69ViJh9YMACnIgqI4cKB3CMwQuwTNX+s0Ecdegg7nvFFziUlUKETIlFRW2IQud+g xpl8XTF17H8ZzGzu5rfXlF3bmXCBJJMaLOx9Ak8DKLCX2ilcG9rWgO2DqTxD82F5GDcz vLugAqC0Z34htPKKHZKHZpYj0Z+p5raJzevGti9r0gahsFvv1Xvg5O3Zv0nZV2yDtTMi 2w==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.149]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp24.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 3bq740aru2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:22 -0700
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.17]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPS id <0R1100VIPHLAKW70@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) id <0R1100J00HJRAC00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 0ffb4ba06162e7d0023839378ebed949
X-Va-E-CD: 27b982fc2293963a25d7cbdff35bf96a
X-Va-R-CD: 443a2f2e7dcde5d597e1157bee9be82a
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 7b272b05-7242-4051-9c96-e6ab21b5c9c3
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 0ffb4ba06162e7d0023839378ebed949
X-V-E-CD: 27b982fc2293963a25d7cbdff35bf96a
X-V-R-CD: 443a2f2e7dcde5d597e1157bee9be82a
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 4bfbfea8-e806-46ac-9860-400686be32ac
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-15_07:2021-10-14, 2021-10-15 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.234.36.7]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPSA id <0R1100XD0HL9VO00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp04.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3691.0.3\))
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <415de97d-7ee7-e9bf-ba18-1c799857e5@nohats.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:10:20 -0700
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, draft-boucadair-add-deployment-considerations@ietf.org, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, ADD Chairs <add-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <46C5F20F-7471-40F6-9ECB-BD0F7B6315CD@apple.com>
References: <163405362776.24337.4864570719046284586@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABcZeBOWQ3-gF1zeyHhxM4YSFqnB+voRHZRPe6UfJOhyOUz2qQ@mail.gmail.com> <415de97d-7ee7-e9bf-ba18-1c799857e5@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3691.0.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-15_07:2021-10-14, 2021-10-15 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/Zc1yg1ORz4ZEXIClr3jAFGDFKMw>
Subject: Re: [Add] The ADD WG has placed draft-boucadair-add-deployment-considerations in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:10:28 -0000

I also agree that this document doesn’t need to be adopted in ADD. It does describe some of the possible deployment setups, but it’s not clear to me that these differences impact the discovery protocols this working group is focused on.

If there needs to be advice written down for deployments of encrypted DNS, perhaps that would belong in DNSOP (who has a charter that includes deployment operational considerations more closely).

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Oct 14, 2021, at 7:19 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
>> Subject: Re: [Add] The ADD WG has placed
>>    draft-boucadair-add-deployment-considerations in state
>>    "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
>> I do not support adoption of this draft. It's largely background material and I do not believe that the WG needs to work on it or publish it as an RFC. It
>> can serve its purpose just fine as an individual draft.
> 
> I agree with Eric. Once we have protocol documents, I don't think this
> documents add anything to implementors for the new protocols to assist
> them with their implementation.
> 
> Paul
> 
> -- 
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email