IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Recent calls for adoption discussion and group consensus

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Fri, 29 October 2021 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F333A13C9; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BnLM3GDHQ9O; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp45.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp45.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 993B83A13C6; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp45.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp45.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19TG3uIC016249; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=+YlvFJmwYFVGOacuzGRaPWaeOsF2xIbNE79OuKiMA1k=; b=p1WuyESQ3Bh/WErhFvbxYpPHdLrMy3W5cj0KIPolqUKFfogJZo258B6c5HjZ0BELl0D9 zICbmdvO4kYJuEeBMkSF1Uw7dnkzGv/yv9xi0ZD0icDvaM1elbK5SVq5B8SYhzu3YfKG IrFgEA1vKQ2X5L45RMNeoweT7mE+71SaKa54tNKezlfHbqmqx3tsDGMsheYUOR7vJi2f 1wPYotBuxvkkCxxWcA26bSZg0iRMxMxW0CWQNAbxfN79HP3dpXvApIVLrdl+SfX6Zxem yDgBhh3wUfYVotcZ2EN2SYDLzCn6KDW0dFG5o+5hfVFLpl2nP+Ig8wCmTth2GzmsArms iQ==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.151]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp45.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 3bx4fdsqdh-9 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:38 -0700
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPS id <0R1Q007E8YCXIYD0@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) id <0R1Q00P00Y8VS600@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 81ca60fce39c2560b6c4a7e5841f9b8f
X-Va-E-CD: 4a3d56af92a60b01894b092d2fe5a8aa
X-Va-R-CD: ba588c2ade72aa398869ce95d2770f9e
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: c2bab799-e068-46a0-9bdb-ed10cb98fad9
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 81ca60fce39c2560b6c4a7e5841f9b8f
X-V-E-CD: 4a3d56af92a60b01894b092d2fe5a8aa
X-V-R-CD: ba588c2ade72aa398869ce95d2770f9e
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 45349472-b354-45ae-8eaf-5985f3b0fcd2
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-29_04:2021-10-29, 2021-10-29 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.234.1.49]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.12.20210903 64bit (built Sep 3 2021)) with ESMTPSA id <0R1Q00H96YCWZ300@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <A42A03CE-1E5C-4650-BA52-62B6F0477C25@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BD2CC849-4E3E-4863-BC34-AE2178205975"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3691.0.3\))
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:12:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <781D8A98-0BE5-41DD-94BC-D5DEC272328D@comcast.com>
Cc: "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
To: "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn_Deen=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <781D8A98-0BE5-41DD-94BC-D5DEC272328D@comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3691.0.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-29_04:2021-10-29, 2021-10-29 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/_y0SIGnxbLbgzZyUjm59aEyUWCY>
Subject: Re: [Add] Recent calls for adoption discussion and group consensus
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:12:43 -0000

Hi Glenn,

Thanks for this update and your careful thought here. I look forward to a productive discussion on these documents at the upcoming meeting!

Best,
Tommy

> On Oct 29, 2021, at 8:25 AM, Deen, Glenn <Glenn_Deen=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi ADD,
>  
> Yesterday the chairs announced the evaluation that the ADD WG Adoption call for 2 documents (1) & (2)  seemed to have sufficient consensus to support WG Adoption.    These were both difficult to evaluate in this case due to the small amount of replies and the chairs used the list discussion and recent meeting discussions to evaluate the direction the group wanted.  It’s easy to make these calls when there is a strong response, especially if you can have the type of discussion beyond basic email to help gain the sense of level of support, but that was not the case for these two recent calls.   
>  
> Ultimately, it’s up to the consensus by the WG participants on what documents move forward.  Consensus is not about one set of views simply out numbering different views, but something more subtle, more complicated to evaluate at times, and not something to rush.    
>  
> It’s more important to get consensus right than it is to simply push ahead, so given that the evaluation of consensus was difficult in these two cases,  the chairs are going to move both docs back to Adoption Call status and extend the discussion by the ADD group before making the final call on adoption for both documents after IETF112.   
>  
> We’ll add slots on the agenda for both documents to give participants the chance to share their views,  and of course discussion and statements for/against adoption should continue on the discussion list.
>  
>  
> Documents under WG Adoption Consideration
> (1) Discovery of Encrypted DNS Resolvers: Deployment Considerations (draft-boucadair-add-deployment-considerations-00)
> (2) Split-Horizon DNS Configuration draft (draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-06)
>  
> Thanks,
> ADD Chairs – Glenn Deen & David Lawrence,  ADD AD – Eric Vyncke
>  
>  
> -- 
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org <mailto:Add@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email