Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 26 July 2010 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A3C3A6A49 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2MX3XRCfp3o for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A763A6AEC for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6Q9Dpfe019312 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:13:51 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk o6Q9Dpfe019312
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1280135631; bh=u1JxlICzu4VLLj8V8mPb52eI11w=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:From:Subject:Date:To; b=VZG5TzdTR9XsBzg2K6TWkoOsRrPWk1al5cxq9OXfWmaXmdg9mdJqxIQ4z1rYbNbQg jwcc5453x3LZHPsgj38wNRBctzFhpMOA0BJmyd8tA/cdoe+kGVwI2Mr1RnT+nrgBrb pWw+qI/DfwasA7yGHUdSE+RLzbp0Gaq2w/UaQPek=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id m6PADp0540033475BP ret-id none; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:13:51 +0100
Received: from cerf.ecs.soton.ac.uk (cerf.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.69.39]) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6Q9DloZ000804 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:13:47 +0100
References: <482E7BB1-B20F-4F96-B632-5F8B8248A4AA@nttv6.net> <9BC19D14-B2D7-49DF-9E8A-192C2839844D@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <482E7BB1-B20F-4F96-B632-5F8B8248A4AA@nttv6.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <EMEW3|485ffd87b61ef2b40ca7f992939f6ae1m6PADp03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|9BC19D14-B2D7-49DF-9E8A-192C2839844D@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:13:47 +0100
To: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=m6PADo054003347500; tid=m6PADp0540033475BP; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: o6Q9Dpfe019312
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:13:39 -0000

Hi,

Some comments....

- the DT draft is missed from the slides: draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-considerations-02

May wish to have a slide summarising the most recent focuses in that draft, for example including some/all of:

- frequent policy changes are linked to having either rapid traffic engineering changes/external routing changes or lots of mobile nodes within the site moving between points of attachment with different policies

- it seems sensible to acquire RFC3484 policy when acquiring other configuration information

- in a managed enterprise there is likely to be a managed policy, and DHCP available

- in dynamic/unmanaged networks using routing hints for address selection *may* be more appropriate

- the problem of handling policy conflict is a host issue, the method to distribute the policy is a network issue - we focus here on the network issue since the host issue is broadly applicable to many configuration parameters

- we should avoid delaying progression of a 3484 policy distribution method applicable to managed enterprise networks

I think this material could fit in a new Slide 3 and then you continue the arifumi-6man-addr-select-conflict reference after that, to keep the flow.

I see a new Troan multihoming draft came out this morning, I've not checked what changes there are yet.

Cheers,
Tim

On 24 Jul 2010, at 23:49, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I drafted the slide for 6man.
> This version still has some clear errors, so
> I have to fix them.
> 
> I really want you all to comment on this.
> About the story itself, wording, typos, and whatever.
> 
> <ietf78-6man-dt.pdf>_______________________________________________
> addr-select-dt mailing list
> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt