Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 26 July 2010 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A973A6ABB for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssTj2+CiWpcN for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB33A6A83 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6QFTVSb003525 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:29:31 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk o6QFTVSb003525
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1280158171; bh=FVmCI0f1X1qchOPQ53XjNMV799I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:From:Subject:Date:To; b=KuI0I3xmKz7+47koZbWQLBHaYa6E4zZ0P9Yfrb5hx8D17/Uan854tCGFhaSIPfUYE yn/mh+48hbhNbVd9rZiWZvNkddt73udt5C46NW/9pSiqQsn53fVi5tu9kyKeEoj/DL qjqHCCqClfJ1wOcNEQxvppWlwi9MbyPBMAFDvKmw=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id m6PGYV0540035931zs ret-id none; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:29:31 +0100
Received: from cerf.ecs.soton.ac.uk (cerf.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.69.39]) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6QFTQgM020251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:29:26 +0100
References: <482E7BB1-B20F-4F96-B632-5F8B8248A4AA@nttv6.net> <9BC19D14-B2D7-49DF-9E8A-192C2839844D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|485ffd87b61ef2b40ca7f992939f6ae1m6PADp03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|9BC19D14-B2D7-49DF-9E8A-192C2839844D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <B46E94FF-C6B0-4727-812F-83C74D92666D@nttv6.net> <139e01cb2cbf$0552f6d0$0ff8e470$@net> <135FB6B0-CA5B-420C-8900-DEEC5C2C41F9@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <139e01cb2cbf$0552f6d0$0ff8e470$@net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <EMEW3|e07ee9f05cc9f5ce4618758d9a252f8fm6PGYV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|135FB6B0-CA5B-420C-8900-DEEC5C2C41F9@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:29:26 +0100
To: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=m6PGYV054003593100; tid=m6PGYV0540035931zs; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: o6QFTVSb003525
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:29:13 -0000

I think Tony's ICMP hint is worth mentioning in that it should fit into the Troan draft discussion, as it's a possible (part) solution to that problem...

Tim

On 26 Jul 2010, at 13:35, Tony Hain wrote:

> I can present it, and don't have any further comments other than a TBD
> reference for pulling the 'try addr sel again' ICMP from
> draft-hain-ipv6-fwrh-03.txt
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: addr-select-dt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:addr-select-dt-
>> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Arifumi Matsumoto
>> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 11:31 AM
>> To: Tim Chown
>> Cc: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation
>> 
>> Thank you for comments.
>> I'll update.
>> 
>> BTW, I saw Tony here in Maastricht.
>> Can you present ??
>> 
>> 
>> On 2010/07/26, at 18:13, Tim Chown wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Some comments....
>>> 
>>> - the DT draft is missed from the slides: draft-ietf-6man-addr-
>> select-considerations-02
>>> 
>>> May wish to have a slide summarising the most recent focuses in that
>> draft, for example including some/all of:
>>> 
>>> - frequent policy changes are linked to having either rapid traffic
>> engineering changes/external routing changes or lots of mobile nodes
>> within the site moving between points of attachment with different
>> policies
>>> 
>>> - it seems sensible to acquire RFC3484 policy when acquiring other
>> configuration information
>>> 
>>> - in a managed enterprise there is likely to be a managed policy, and
>> DHCP available
>>> 
>>> - in dynamic/unmanaged networks using routing hints for address
>> selection *may* be more appropriate
>>> 
>>> - the problem of handling policy conflict is a host issue, the method
>> to distribute the policy is a network issue - we focus here on the
>> network issue since the host issue is broadly applicable to many
>> configuration parameters
>>> 
>>> - we should avoid delaying progression of a 3484 policy distribution
>> method applicable to managed enterprise networks
>>> 
>>> I think this material could fit in a new Slide 3 and then you
>> continue the arifumi-6man-addr-select-conflict reference after that, to
>> keep the flow.
>>> 
>>> I see a new Troan multihoming draft came out this morning, I've not
>> checked what changes there are yet.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> On 24 Jul 2010, at 23:49, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I drafted the slide for 6man.
>>>> This version still has some clear errors, so
>>>> I have to fix them.
>>>> 
>>>> I really want you all to comment on this.
>>>> About the story itself, wording, typos, and whatever.
>>>> 
>>>> <ietf78-6man-dt.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>>>> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>>> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>