Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation

[Tim Chown <[e-mail]>]

I think Tony's ICMP hint is worth mentioning in that it should fit into the Troan draft discussion, as it's a possible (part) solution to that problem...

Tim

On 26 Jul 2010, at 13:35, Tony Hain wrote:

> I can present it, and don't have any further comments other than a TBD
> reference for pulling the 'try addr sel again' ICMP from
> draft-hain-ipv6-fwrh-03.txt
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:addr-select-dt-
>> [e-mail]] On Behalf Of Arifumi Matsumoto
>> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 11:31 AM
>> To: Tim Chown
>> Cc: [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] slide to 6man presentation
>> 
>> Thank you for comments.
>> I'll update.
>> 
>> BTW, I saw Tony here in Maastricht.
>> Can you present ??
>> 
>> 
>> On 2010/07/26, at 18:13, Tim Chown wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Some comments....
>>> 
>>> - the DT draft is missed from the slides: draft-ietf-6man-addr-
>> select-considerations-02
>>> 
>>> May wish to have a slide summarising the most recent focuses in that
>> draft, for example including some/all of:
>>> 
>>> - frequent policy changes are linked to having either rapid traffic
>> engineering changes/external routing changes or lots of mobile nodes
>> within the site moving between points of attachment with different
>> policies
>>> 
>>> - it seems sensible to acquire RFC3484 policy when acquiring other
>> configuration information
>>> 
>>> - in a managed enterprise there is likely to be a managed policy, and
>> DHCP available
>>> 
>>> - in dynamic/unmanaged networks using routing hints for address
>> selection *may* be more appropriate
>>> 
>>> - the problem of handling policy conflict is a host issue, the method
>> to distribute the policy is a network issue - we focus here on the
>> network issue since the host issue is broadly applicable to many
>> configuration parameters
>>> 
>>> - we should avoid delaying progression of a 3484 policy distribution
>> method applicable to managed enterprise networks
>>> 
>>> I think this material could fit in a new Slide 3 and then you
>> continue the arifumi-6man-addr-select-conflict reference after that, to
>> keep the flow.
>>> 
>>> I see a new Troan multihoming draft came out this morning, I've not
>> checked what changes there are yet.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> On 24 Jul 2010, at 23:49, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I drafted the slide for 6man.
>>>> This version still has some clear errors, so
>>>> I have to fix them.
>>>> 
>>>> I really want you all to comment on this.
>>>> About the story itself, wording, typos, and whatever.
>>>> 
>>>> <ietf78-6man-dt.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> addr-select-dt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt
>