Re: [addr-select-dt] draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 11 March 2011 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6AA3A6AE3 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:15:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dGhUQaQp1v3G for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979383A6811 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2B0GjpR014014 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:16:45 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk p2B0GjpR014014
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1299802605; bh=RE8WiPo22vE3SI9KIHz0Zl0Wgeo=; h=From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References; b=09KMky/e+kjD2Odl0uTzli3sJTKOxrwepiznTrPvQM/W9odYI6cOmK462OAzJ9njO atE71V7BnYuDUrdKsXiDYUYCkB+PWr+MkizdAlpsOACV8lunB1yQjvjThiptogn5CO SIKBfYklbeWt5LZCr8fo+dttfx4BuhrOiRTwENT0=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.136]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.146]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id n2A0Gj1747959368SS ret-id none; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:16:45 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2B0GVch026378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:16:32 GMT
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-37--627155692
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:16:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <3ABDA38B-EC8D-445F-BDB0-9D265794CEE8@nttv6.net>
To: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
References: <3ABDA38B-EC8D-445F-BDB0-9D265794CEE8@nttv6.net> <EE4D601C-D0B8-41A7-B0FF-2B7384C6408E@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|439bf15624adaebf5d25e951e1da714dn2A0Gj03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|EE4D601C-D0B8-41A7-B0FF-2B7384C6408E@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=n2A0Gj174795936800; tid=n2A0Gj1747959368SS; client=relay,white,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: p2B0GjpR014014
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:15:34 -0000

Hi,

I have edited the txt file, largely to tidy up the English in a few places.   There's nothing I disagree with in the text.   So you could diff the file with yours to see if you want to apply the changes.

Some other comments:

We don't cite draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-sol-03 or draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-req-07 - would this be worth doing?    Should probably have a final pass through those to ensure everything is captured in the 3484 bis text?

Note the address selection considerations reference is now a WG item: draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-considerations-02; this needs updating in your text.

I found this sentence a little clumsy:
"When a destination address DA, DB, and the source address of DA
   Source(DA) are on the same subnet and Source(DA) == Source(DB), DNS
   round robin load-balancing cannot function. "
Maybe it can be written a little more clearly?

Quite a few of the citations (reference labels) appear after the full stops in sentences, not before.   Corrected in the attached text.

Do we want to add a rule for 2001:db8:: ?     If 3ffe:: is in there...

And I would still love to see a way to add a rule to put privacy address preference in there.   This would be a great way to help answer the concerns in long email threads currently running in other lists :)

Tim


On 9 Mar 2011, at 10:38, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:

> All,
> 
> here attached the -02 version of RFC 3484 revision work.
> I'm very sorry about the long suspension on this item,
> despite your commitment on it.
> 
> If you can comment on it, I think I can incorporate it
> before the cut-off.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> <draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02.txt>
> --
> Arifumi Matsumoto
>  NGN System Architecture Project
>  NTT Service Integration Laboratories
>  E-mail: arifumi@nttv6.net
>  TEL +81-422-59-3334 FAX +81-422-59-6364
> 
> _______________________________________________
> addr-select-dt mailing list
> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt