Re: [addr-select-dt] I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02.txt

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 14 March 2011 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890073A6D72 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q+WlA4EmspQY for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1C83A6D67 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2EDq7DF003036 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:52:07 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk p2EDq7DF003036
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1300110727; bh=BWXVom7NcsF2Nb4hRGlPpqaYs14=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=B3gbG7B3pve7/vap+AUZdv+rgJqIEaCMYAm/aenuCgq5qAY/uHUl77Kyd51oe1YqO X7djvb+jzFRtR84g1fSqjYWwf1lJy3HIhMg0IGffl7qZoM+JwLhGmobfglWoPnmxPg 9k5z/jFOPdKik2tma0dERzM5BobDq9gNYV9nNsXI=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.136]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.146]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id n2DDq71747912702M4 ret-id none; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:52:07 +0000
Received: from dhcp-152-78-94-103.ecs.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-152-78-94-103.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.94.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2EDp1VU023801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:51:01 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20110314100003.5501.5607.idtracker@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:51:00 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|5a77b3f8e91cbd0cbb18b89f7a72f768n2DDq703tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|3D4A88A5-E620-49B9-9EA1-28D02E3B7450@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <20110314100003.5501.5607.idtracker@localhost> <3D4A88A5-E620-49B9-9EA1-28D02E3B7450@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=n2DDq7174791270200; tid=n2DDq71747912702M4; client=relay,white,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: p2EDq7DF003036
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02.txt
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:50:53 -0000

Hi,

First my thoughts are with everyone in Japan at this time.   I hope you and your families are safe.   It must be so terrible.

My question on this draft is whether we need to also take this update text and integrate it into a new 3484, i.e. produce a completely new RFC to obsolete 3484?   If so, I would be happy to be one of the editors if that would help.

Tim

On 14 Mar 2011, at 10:00, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> 	Title           : Update to RFC 3484 Default Address Selection for IPv6
> 	Author(s)       : A. Matsumoto, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2011-03-14
> 
> RFC 3484 describes algorithms for source address selection and for
> destination address selection.  The algorithms specify default
> behavior for all Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) implementations.
> This document specifies a set of updates that modify the algorithms
> and provide fixes for the identified issues.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.
> <Mail Attachment>_______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt