IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] ALTO Side Meeting

"RANDRIAMASY, SABINE (SABINE)" <sabine.randriamasy@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sabine.randriamasy@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5C821F8E3C for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5+fjMy8WYfP8 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446F621F8E3B for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r2DH971l005373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:09:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.36]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r2DH8xkc030895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:09:06 -0500
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) by US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:50:55 -0400
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.210]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:50:48 +0100
From: "RANDRIAMASY, SABINE (SABINE)" <sabine.randriamasy@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [alto] ALTO Side Meeting
Thread-Index: AQHOH0vE1DM6331480asjZ1uATmHhJij1q9A
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:50:47 +0000
Message-ID: <A7A5844EB93EB94AB22C2068B10AD65A67A022@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CANUuoLq9aCC3+JyE3r+uT7Q1pVdx91LXnigehQ7gw9ti9+kKNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANUuoLq9aCC3+JyE3r+uT7Q1pVdx91LXnigehQ7gw9ti9+kKNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A7A5844EB93EB94AB22C2068B10AD65A67A022FR711WXCHMBA01zeu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Side Meeting
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:09:20 -0000

Hi Richard, Reinaldo and all,

I am not attending the IETF meeting this time and will probably not be able to listen to the side meeting at 8:15 PM

I believe the take aways of this meeting will base further WG discussions to prepare future ALTO work.
So extension proposals such as Multi-Cost ALTO (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-randriamasy-alto-multi-cost-07) and ALTO Cost Schedule (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-randriamasy-alto-cost-schedule-02.txt) are I hope still part of the potential extension items.

Where  as Multi-Cost has been presented a number of times, I'd like to draw attention on the last developments of the ALTO Cost schedule draft, in particular with a use case for SDN where the Cost schedule may help for application traffic balancing given that load balancing is an important topic to the SDN RG. The slides although not presented at the last WG meeting, can be seen here http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/85/slides/slides-85-alto-4.pdf

Thanks,
Sabine


De : alto-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:alto-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Y. Richard Yang
Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2013 18:59
À : IETF ALTO
Objet : [alto] ALTO Side Meeting

Dear all,

We have revised the side meeting plan a bit. The current schedule is at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DgVx7_xrF4ZipwflVnlvvylsndJ9I57gJTD8_Hj7ywo/edit

Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.

Hope to see you there.

Richard, Reinaldo, Young

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email