[alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 12 March 2020 03:46 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: alto@ietf.org
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C85E3A0A85; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org, alto@ietf.org, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, vkg@bell-labs.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.120.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <158398476822.19755.15842999304860496392@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:46:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/PB0fwDP5AfL7lYIbMF5fFsbngD8>
Subject: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 03:46:10 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work on this document. I strongly agree with Suresh’s first point, regarding the restatement of the merge algorithm. I have one additional comment: Section 3.1.2.1: "ipv4" : [ "192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/25", "193.51.100.0/25" ], The address "193.51.100.0" is from a block allocated to the University of Paris. Please change it to an RFC 5737 documentation address. (This occurs twice in the document)
- [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-al… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Y. Richard Yang