[alto] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-new-transport/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thank you for this document.  I haven't reviewed this document that closely,
and it might be interesting to know whether there are interoperable
implementations of this specification, or where there may still be issues
lurking, or more precise text to describe its behavior and APIs.  Hence, I was
wondering whether it would be better from this document to be published as an
experimental RFC rather than Proposed Standard, this would then leave a lot
more flexibility for making more substantial changes to the protocol
specification in future, if needed.

Regards,
Rob