Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA3E21F8526 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:19:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dKDrvjoEP14H for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBD621F861A for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id APM45640; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:19:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:18:26 +0000
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:19:21 +0000
Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.175]) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.134]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:19:18 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal
Thread-Index: AQHOBG6XMZB9+ODSOky6Yv8R/SkQnphtESJw
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:19:17 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17290FCA17@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17290FC244@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <51125BA0.1010600@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <51125BA0.1010600@neclab.eu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:19:35 -0000
Martin, Thanks for your feedback. When do you expect the ALTO protocol to move to the IESG evaluation? Regards, Young -----Original Message----- From: Martin Stiemerling [mailto:martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 7:33 AM To: Leeyoung; alto@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal Hi all, Just to make a point: This WG is not allowed to discuss any re-chartering efforts until the ALTO protocol is in IESG evaluation. There at least two outstanding questions on the ALTO protocol posted by Reinaldo that have not been addressed yet. And I do not have the feeling that there is sufficient energy in the group to answer the questions. So, please get the ALTO protocol done and afterwards talk about any recharter. Thanks, Martin -- IETF Transport Area Director martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 283 On 02/05/2013 11:17 PM, Leeyoung wrote: > Hello ALTO WG participants, > > We have uploaded a couple of drafts. > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-alto-app-net-info-exchange/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-alto-ext-dc-resource/ > > This is an follow-up effort to address the issues raised in the i2aex > BOF. The first draft addresses the need to extend the current ALTO cost > map to include a graph type that depicts critical links and resource > bottlenecks of underlying network topology. The second draft addresses > how to model data center resources using ALTO model. This draft > addresses what abstraction is needed in the context of data center > selection problem. > > In order to continue on with this work, we believe the current charter > would need to be re-chartered in the spirit of i2aex. It would be great > to know if there is enough interest in this kind of work in ALTO WG. > > Best Regards, > > Young > > > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >
- [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal Leeyoung
- Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex pro… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex pro… Leeyoung
- Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex pro… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex pro… Martin Stiemerling