Re: [alto] charter extension to support i2aex proposal

Hi all,

Just to make a point:

This WG is not allowed to discuss any re-chartering efforts until the 
ALTO protocol is in IESG evaluation.

There at least two outstanding questions on the ALTO protocol posted by 
Reinaldo that have not been addressed yet. And I do not have the feeling 
that there is sufficient energy in the group to answer the questions.

So, please get the ALTO protocol done and afterwards talk about any 
recharter.

Thanks,

   Martin

-- 
IETF Transport Area Director

martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
Registered in England 283

On 02/05/2013 11:17 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
> Hello ALTO WG participants,
>
> We have uploaded a couple of drafts.
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-alto-app-net-info-exchange/
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-alto-ext-dc-resource/
>
> This is an follow-up effort to address the issues raised in the i2aex
> BOF. The first draft addresses the need to extend the current ALTO cost
> map to include a graph type that depicts critical links and resource
> bottlenecks of underlying network topology. The second draft addresses
> how to model data center resources using ALTO model. This draft
> addresses what abstraction is needed in the context of data center
> selection problem.
>
> In order to continue on with this work, we believe the current charter
> would need to be re-chartered in the spirit of i2aex.  It would be great
> to know if there is enough interest in this kind of work in ALTO WG.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Young
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>