IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [altoext] [alto] i2aex BOF - SDN Use Case

Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org> Sun, 25 March 2012 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Original-To: altoext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: altoext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2421E8012 for <altoext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2onKDe0H6R4Q for <altoext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C9F21E8024 for <altoext@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2+PK54ma8QN5GMG3lYoEa3+eI8jvW1+@postini.com; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:32 PDT
Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so7328247iae.15 for <altoext@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Z7rDzibWnpj5L7YRrsIfUrpbDKHpLSix6IPmVIFgPEo=; b=iFsqnrjMv6YzjsrMvaPqEBFY/xsZEmhbNMoh5avWn+jU/lDvh6Gn+akGahMQgsY1sl 1VPMuEez2q2rYBz50eKznvEc5w6EOUwFmT2sFxyxwsgpsV/8djEhyNXDAZVfuAdBUlBf 5D+/jhAMwGamyk7vOvPuvhVwimLVNyYiMNIzjLGNe/Q5bK1NHAwHtvmd39WE2kzClmgx MhYfY4n0pu6v0yYGnEJ2Hq7Bi3BMIHljGfilV56K6IlepZ6QdIfNAqHbhPAjdj+VD30O G/wBL3aAjaj7MyImXNzVGxL/deK76mLOY6B492LeYgAFxzingBNPkX40yhcZ5oB1n7Fx FZmA==
Received: by 10.50.208.106 with SMTP id md10mr4001892igc.21.1332711211338; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.134.72 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CB95020B.B3FD8%kgray@juniper.net>
References: <CAHEV9L3KjM6Fua6T0dGHRbQB91V3R1NS1jKuR2tawjcMf38=uQ@mail.gmail.com> <CB95020B.B3FD8%kgray@juniper.net>
From: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:32:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHEV9L1ZcjAbQtBxGdKhEtNhjTdU-2ksJj0PascS_TUhxk_WxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ken Gray <kgray@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9340881570a1504bc18028f"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQncm804ZPoZ1nem4YqP8RYlnUpiMiQBBVcd+s5JXz+uw5lWF8nQaa/4zrUu6n9zv0S73qj/
Cc: "altoext@ietf.org" <altoext@ietf.org>, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>, ZongNing <zongning@huawei.com>, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [altoext] [alto] i2aex BOF - SDN Use Case
X-BeenThere: altoext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non-WG list for discussions related to ALTO Protocol Extensions <altoext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/altoext>, <mailto:altoext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/altoext>
List-Post: <mailto:altoext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:altoext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/altoext>, <mailto:altoext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:33:33 -0000

Agree 100%.

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Ken Gray <kgray@juniper.net> wrote:

> What SDN needs is a standardized interface for representing topology
> amongst the many candidates (there's at least one other source I can think
> of off the top of my head … BGP-TE …and of course, static maps) that allows
> for varying richness in functionality.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email