[ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-05
Fortune HUANG <fqhuang@huawei.com> Tue, 07 April 2009 04:26 UTC
Return-Path: <fqhuang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22D23A67E9 for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LIZsq2YbpmX for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177843A680A for <ancp@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KHP00C23R21B7@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ancp@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:27:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KHP00F2JR21QR@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for ancp@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:27:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from h36145c ([10.70.39.123]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KHP00NLOR1Z2G@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for ancp@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:27:35 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:27:35 +0800
From: Fortune HUANG <fqhuang@huawei.com>
To: ancp@ietf.org
Message-id: <00d701c9b739$2d0c4ed0$7b27460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_3qDpUjt8w79iyUxgT195/Q)"
Thread-index: Acm3OSz0fRJk81LAS/ytLoiulpiByg==
Subject: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:26:55 -0000
Hi all, I have a question about the Tech Type in ANCP protocol for clarification. It says "Tech Type" value of 0x05 SHOULD be used by ANCP for DSL technology in section 5.4.1.1 of draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-05. I can find two related technology type registries at the website http://www.iana.org/protocols/ as follows, but the 0x05 has been allocated in both registries. Is the first registry with the name Access Technology Types the right registry for the Tech Type in ANCP protocol, please? If it is, I propose we change the 0x05 for DSL in section 5.4.1.1 to be 0x09 or "to be allocated by IANA" in order to avoid incorrect implementation. Registry Name: Access Technology Types Reference: [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] Registration Procedures: Expert Review Registry: Value Name Reference -------- ------------------------------------------------- --------- 0 Reserved [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 1 802.3 [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 2 802.11a/b/g [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 3 802.16e [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 4 802.16m [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 5 3GPP EUTRAN/LTE [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 6 3GPP UTRAN/GERAN [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 7 3GPP2 1xRTT/HRPD [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 8 3GPP2 UMB [RFC-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-10.txt] 9-255 Unassigned Access Technology Type Option type values Reference [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] Registration Procedures Expert Review Value Description Reference Registration Date 0 Reserved [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 1 Virtual [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 2 PPP [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 3 IEEE 802.3 [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 4 IEEE 802.11a/b/g [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 5 IEEE 802.16e [ <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5213> RFC5213] 6 3GPP GERAN [ <http://www.3gpp.org/specs/specs.htm> 3GPP TS 29.275][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Julien_Laganier> Julien_Laganier] 2008-07-30 7 3GPP UTRAN [ <http://www.3gpp.org/specs/specs.htm> 3GPP TS 29.275][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Julien_Laganier> Julien_Laganier] 2008-07-30 8 3GPP E-UTRAN [ <http://www.3gpp.org/specs/specs.htm> 3GPP TS 29.275][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Julien_Laganier> Julien_Laganier] 2008-07-30 9 3GPP2 eHRPD [ <http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/index.cfm> 3GPP2 X.P0057][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Kuntal_Chowdhury> Kuntal_Chowdhury] 2008-08-21 10 3GPP2 HRPD [ <http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/index.cfm> 3GPP2 X.P0061][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Kuntal_Chowdhury> Kuntal_Chowdhury] 2008-08-21 11 3GPP2 1xRTT [ <http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/index.cfm> 3GPP2 X.S0011][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Kuntal_Chowdhury> Kuntal_Chowdhury] 2008-08-21 12 3GPP2 UMB [ <http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/index.cfm> 3GPP2 X.S0054][ <http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xht ml#Kuntal_Chowdhury> Kuntal_Chowdhury] 2008-08-21 13-255 Unassigned Best Regards, Fortune
- [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-ietf… Fortune HUANG
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-… Sanjay Wadhwa
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-… Fortune HUANG
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-… Fortune HUANG
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-… Sanjay Wadhwa
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the TechType in draft-i… HaagT
- Re: [ANCP] Question about the Tech Type in draft-… Fortune HUANG