Re: [ANCP] IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt

"Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com> Sat, 09 November 2013 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <robmgl@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B2521E8089 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:09:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id woSNAmFmH1hZ for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9089E21F9DAF for <ancp@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5004; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384031383; x=1385240983; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mTB8/iEAbq0swvyuk/3CZ8HK3r4DXxfIo2/bY3JWwRA=; b=kOoURXrEkpxPXH+BcHNds2f15IKCsUyL6MvJlQ0vYEd+ldiDdYk2QLML FRaeqrDeQA1xuMLjvebdlMrMeIev60T+6XyOUv1AV+oV7gbZrtsOHA9uj FKsdn0MQ5IzJBOxGzJIwU8IEc0A0+5+mNrMvQglE0cAS/fK9i5siaJLV9 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAIOjflKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgkNEwCWBLBZ0giYBAQR5EAIBCD8HMhQRAgQOBYgBvGeOHoFJB4MggRADmA+SCoMmgXE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,668,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="282871740"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2013 21:09:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA9L9gDC017601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:09:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.140]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 15:09:42 -0600
From: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHO3BlrzJQvjGXHpkWqg3ntuRPqlZodZ9BT
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:09:41 +0000
Message-ID: <6EDA6AF5-9680-4705-8213-59664C9D18E3@cisco.com>
References: <CEA1E08C.57299%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA1E08C.57299%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6EDA6AF596804705821359664C9D18E3ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:21:01 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions@tools.ietf.org>, "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ANCP] IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 21:09:49 -0000

Hello,
I am not aware of IPR related to this draft.
Roberta

Sent from my iPad

On 2013-11-07, at 7:28 PM, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:

Authors,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Publication for this draft will not be requested until a response has been received from each author.

Regards

Matthew