Re: [Anima] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 31 October 2014 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32691A8B84; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs7NxVPpQHQ2; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE0C1A8ADF; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D259BE11; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:57:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ANiuUKNrYGL; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:57:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F15ECBE09; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:57:57 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54539566.7000304@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:57:58 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <20141030135938.20303.81400.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5452D190.1060007@gmail.com> <5452F091.3050503@cs.tcd.ie> <54539542.8070607@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54539542.8070607@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/06pnK1TERzpz1Tr5YaeufN-lPpw
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on charter-ietf-anima-00-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:58:00 -0000


On 31/10/14 13:57, Benoit Claise wrote:
> On 31/10/2014 03:14, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> On 31/10/14 00:02, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> On 31/10/2014 02:59, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> I support Ted's block (I think:-).  I suspect that this will be sorted
>>>> out ok by the WG if it can be, but I'd also like some better clarity
>>>> on how the security bootstrapping here and in homenet are
>>>> related/differ.
>>> IMHO understanding that (and where draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch
>>> fits in) is part of the first order of business of the WG. I don't
>>> think we can resolve it without more technical analysis.
>> Agreed. My remaining, but for-now-ignorable concern relates to
>> the current wording which sort-of tells anima to re-use homenet
>> work in this space - I think it's likely different solutions
>> for security bootstrapping will be needed and so we ought not end
>> up trying to stop work on one such just because another exists,
>> if the use-cases/environments are in reality sufficiently
>> different. I'll try work with Benoit to suggest some better words
>> but do agree that what's really needed is the detailed analysis
>> which needs both WGs doing work and isn't a thing to try fix in
>> either charter.
> Here is what Stephen and I came up with:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> Where suitable protocols, models or methods exist (for example, in the
> HOMENET
> WG), they will be preferred over creating new ones.
> 
> NEW:
> 
> ANIMA and HOMENET will need to co-ordinate to ensure that the
> commonalities and differences in solutions are
> properly taken into account.Where suitable protocols, models or methods
> exist, they will be preferred over creating new ones.
> 
> This is now in the charter v19

Thanks, looks fine to me,
S.

> 
> Regards, Benoit
> 
> 
>>
>> S.
>>
>>
>>>      Brian
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima mailing list
>> Anima@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>>
> 
>